1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Somatic Sphere"
Split Justification: The Somatic Sphere encompasses all physical aspects of the self. These can be fundamentally divided based on whether they are directly accessible to conscious awareness and subjective experience (e.g., pain, touch, proprioception) or whether they operate autonomously and beneath the threshold of conscious perception (e.g., heart rate, digestion, cellular metabolism). Every bodily sensation, state, or process falls into one of these two categories, making them mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
4
From: "Autonomic & Unconscious Somatic Processes"
Split Justification: ** All unconscious somatic processes are fundamentally regulated through either the dedicated neural pathways of the autonomic nervous system or through the intrinsic, self-regulating mechanisms of other physiological systems (e.g., endocrine, immune, cellular, local tissue systems). These two categories comprehensively cover all autonomous and unconscious bodily functions and are mutually exclusive in their primary regulatory mechanism.
5
From: "Non-Neural Autonomous Physiological Processes"
Split Justification: Non-neural autonomous physiological processes can be fundamentally divided based on the scale and transport mechanism of their primary regulatory signals. One category encompasses regulation achieved through chemical messengers (such as hormones, circulating cytokines, or antibodies) that are transported via body fluids (blood, lymph, interstitial fluid) to exert widespread or distant effects throughout the organism. The other category comprises processes that are intrinsic to the cell or local tissue itself, relying on internal cellular mechanisms (e.g., metabolism, gene expression), direct physical or chemical responses within the immediate tissue environment, or paracrine/autocrine signaling confined to the immediate vicinity, without requiring systemic transport for their primary regulatory action. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a regulatory mechanism either relies on systemic transport for its primary action or it does not, and together they comprehensively cover all non-neural autonomous physiological processes.
6
From: "Systemic Humoral Regulation"
Split Justification: Systemic humoral regulation is fundamentally mediated by either hormones, which are chemical messengers predominantly secreted by endocrine glands to regulate diverse physiological processes like metabolism, growth, and reproduction; or by immune factors (such as cytokines and antibodies), which are chemical messengers primarily produced by immune cells to coordinate defense, inflammation, and immune surveillance. These two categories represent distinct yet comprehensive regulatory systems, ensuring that all systemic, non-neural chemical signaling is covered, with their primary origins and functional domains being mutually exclusive.
7
From: "Immune System Humoral Regulation"
Split Justification: Immune System Humoral Regulation is fundamentally distinguished based on whether the regulatory chemical messengers mediate responses belonging to the innate or adaptive branches of immunity. Innate immune humoral regulation involves factors (e.g., complement proteins, acute phase proteins, certain cytokines) that provide immediate, non-specific defense. Adaptive immune humoral regulation involves factors (e.g., antibodies, specific cytokines from lymphocytes) that enable highly specific, memory-based responses. This dichotomy is mutually exclusive because a given humoral regulatory mechanism's primary role and context is either non-specific or specific, and comprehensively exhaustive as all systemic humoral regulation within the immune system falls under one of these two fundamental types of immune response.
8
From: "Humoral Regulation of Innate Immunity"
Split Justification: ** Humoral regulation of innate immunity can be fundamentally divided based on whether the regulatory components belong to the highly organized and distinct complement cascade system or comprise other systemic, non-complement chemical messengers. The complement system involves a specific set of interacting proteins that activate sequentially to achieve various immune functions (e.g., direct lysis, opsonization, inflammation). All other systemic innate humoral factors, such as cytokines, acute phase proteins, and circulating antimicrobial peptides, act through distinct mechanisms that do not primarily involve this specific cascade. This distinction provides a mutually exclusive categorization because a humoral factor is either a component of the complement system or it is not, and it is comprehensively exhaustive as all known systemic innate humoral regulators fall into one of these two fundamental categories.
9
From: "Complement System Humoral Regulators"
Split Justification: The complement system consists of a diverse set of humoral proteins. These can be fundamentally divided based on their primary functional role within the cascade: either they directly participate in initiating, propagating, and executing the effector functions of complement (e.g., pathogen lysis, opsonization, inflammation), or their principal role is to control, limit, or inhibit the complement cascade to prevent excessive activation and damage to host tissues. This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a complement protein's primary function is either to drive or to restrain the cascade, and it is comprehensively exhaustive, covering all known components of the complement system.
10
From: "Complement Regulatory and Inhibitory Proteins"
Split Justification: Complement regulatory and inhibitory proteins fundamentally achieve their control either by modulating complement activation in the circulating fluids (e.g., plasma, lymph) or by protecting host cells directly through their presence on cell surfaces. This distinction based on their primary functional location—fluid-phase versus cell-surface—is mutually exclusive, as a protein's predominant site of action for complement regulation is distinctively one or the other, and comprehensively exhaustive, encompassing all known categories of complement regulatory and inhibitory proteins.
11
From: "Soluble Complement Regulatory Proteins"
Split Justification: Soluble complement regulatory proteins fundamentally exert their control at distinct stages of the complement cascade. One category of proteins primarily acts during the early and amplification phases by preventing initial activation (e.g., C1-INH) or by controlling the formation, stability, or activity of C3 convertases (e.g., Factor H, C4bp, Factor I). The other category specifically targets the terminal phase, preventing the assembly or membrane insertion of the Membrane Attack Complex (MAC) by binding to complement components later in the cascade (e.g., S-protein/Vitronectin, Clusterin). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a given soluble regulatory protein's primary site of action is either in the early/amplification steps or the terminal pathway, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all major points of soluble complement inhibition.
12
From: "Soluble Regulators of Terminal Pathway and MAC Formation"
Split Justification: The terminal pathway of complement activation fundamentally involves two sequential stages for MAC formation: the assembly and stabilization of the C5b-8 complex, and the subsequent polymerization and membrane insertion of multiple C9 molecules. Soluble regulatory proteins can fundamentally intervene at these two distinct points. One category primarily exerts its control by directly binding to C9, thereby inhibiting its polymerization into a pore and preventing its insertion into cell membranes. The other category primarily acts by binding to and stabilizing the earlier C5b-8 complex (or its precursors like C5b-7), preventing its proper assembly, causing its dissociation, or blocking its ability to associate with cell membranes and recruit C9. This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a given soluble regulator's primary site of action is either directly on C9 or on the earlier C5b-8 complex/its precursors, and it is comprehensively exhaustive, covering all major points of soluble intervention in terminal pathway and MAC formation.
✓
Topic: "Soluble Regulators Primarily Preventing C9 Polymerization and Membrane Insertion" (W5421)