1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Quantitative/Logical Reasoning"
Split Justification: Logical reasoning can be strictly formal following rules of inference (**Deductive Proof**) or drawing general conclusions from specific examples (**Inductive Reasoning Case Study**). (L5 Split)
6
From: "Inductive Reasoning Case Study"
Split Justification: Induction involves forming general rules (**Hypothesis Generation**) and testing their predictive power (**Hypothesis Testing**). (L6 Split)
7
From: "Hypothesis Generation"
Split Justification: Generating a hypothesis requires identifying a pattern (**Observing Correlations**) and formulating a testable explanation (**Stating a Falsifiable Claim**).
8
From: "Stating a Falsifiable Claim"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between claims that assert a specific outcome based on given conditions and claims that assert a universal property or relationship for an entire category, both being fundamental forms of falsifiable statements.
9
From: "Stating a Categorical Generalization"
Split Justification: This dichotomy differentiates categorical generalizations based on the scope of their quantifier: whether the claim applies to all members of a category (universal) or to at least one member (particular). This is a fundamental logical distinction that is mutually exclusive and comprehensively covers all forms of categorical generalizations.
10
From: "Particular Categorical Generalization"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates particular categorical generalizations based on whether their specificity arises from delineating the population or domain to which the generalization applies (defined scope), or from specifying the situational, environmental, or operational criteria under which the generalization holds true (stated conditions). These represent distinct modes of particularizing a general claim.
11
From: "Generalization with Defined Scope"
Split Justification: This dichotomy categorizes how the scope of a generalization is delimited, either by specifying characteristics that entities must possess to be included (inclusionary) or by specifying characteristics that entities must not possess to be excluded (exclusionary). This covers all fundamental methods of defining a set's boundaries.
12
From: "Scope Defined by Exclusionary Criteria"
Split Justification: This dichotomy differentiates how the excluded scope is defined: either by explicitly listing the particular items, entities, or sub-categories that are not included (specific instances/categories), or by specifying a general characteristic, property, or circumstance that, if met, renders an item outside the scope (defining properties/conditions).
✓
Topic: "Exclusion by Specific Instances or Categories" (W5583)