1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Quantitative/Logical Reasoning"
Split Justification: Logical reasoning can be strictly formal following rules of inference (**Deductive Proof**) or drawing general conclusions from specific examples (**Inductive Reasoning Case Study**). (L5 Split)
6
From: "Deductive Proof."
Split Justification: Deductive systems can be analyzed based on the relationship between whole statements (**Propositional Logic**) or the properties of objects and their relations (**Predicate Logic**). (L6 Split)
7
From: "Propositional Logic"
Split Justification: Propositional logic involves determining the validity of arguments (**Truth Table Construction**) and applying rules of inference (**Using Modus Ponens/Tollens**).
8
From: "Using Modus Ponens/Tollens"
Split Justification: The parent node explicitly refers to two distinct forms of deductive inference. This split separates the application of Modus Ponens (affirming the antecedent) from the application of Modus Tollens (denying the consequent), which are the two fundamental and mutually exclusive inferential mechanisms described by the parent concept. Together, they comprehensively cover the scope of the parent node.
9
From: "Using Modus Ponens"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the analytical task of assessing existing arguments that utilize Modus Ponens (evaluating their validity or correctness) from the synthetic task of actively employing Modus Ponens as a rule of inference to construct new valid deductions or derive new conclusions.
10
From: "Evaluating Modus Ponens Inferences"
Split Justification: Evaluating a Modus Ponens inference fundamentally involves two distinct processes: first, verifying that the argument's form correctly adheres to the Modus Ponens structure (which inherently implies its validity); and second, assessing the factual or contextual truth of the specific premises within that structure. These two aspects comprehensively cover the evaluation of soundness in a deductive argument.
11
From: "Assessment of Premise Truth Values"
Split Justification: This dichotomy categorizes the assessment of premise truth values based on whether the truth can be known independently of experience (a priori) or only through experience and observation (a posteriori). These two modes of justification are fundamental, mutually exclusive for a given premise's truth derivation, and comprehensively cover how premise truth values are established in logical arguments.
12
From: "Assessment of A Posteriori Truth Values"
Split Justification: This split differentiates between assessing a posteriori truth values based on evidence obtained through direct personal sensory experience or measurement, versus through inference, testimony, or the analysis of data derived from others' experiences or established models.
✓
Topic: "Direct Empirical Assessment" (W5695)