1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the receptive aspects of linguistic reasoning, involving the understanding and interpretation of spoken or written language, from the expressive aspects, which involve the formulation and production of spoken or written language. These are distinct, fundamental processes that together encompass all facets of verbal reasoning.
6
From: "Verbal Comprehension"
Split Justification: This split distinguishes between understanding the explicit, directly stated meaning of verbal information and understanding the unstated, implied, or deeper meaning that requires synthesis and deduction. These represent distinct levels of cognitive processing within overall verbal comprehension.
7
From: "Literal Comprehension"
Split Justification: Literal comprehension, while aiming for the explicit meaning, is fundamentally processed through two distinct input modalities: visual (written language) and auditory (spoken language). The cognitive mechanisms for decoding and understanding orthographic symbols differ significantly from those for phonological sounds, making this a fundamental and mutually exclusive dichotomy that comprehensively covers all forms of verbal literal comprehension.
8
From: "Literal Comprehension of Spoken Language"
Split Justification: Literal comprehension of spoken language fundamentally involves understanding the explicit meaning of individual words and phrases (lexical units) as they are heard, and understanding the explicit meaning derived from the grammatical relations and syntactic structure that connect those words within the utterance. These two components are distinct yet essential for full literal comprehension.
9
From: "Literal Comprehension of Spoken Lexical Meaning"
Split Justification: Literal comprehension of a spoken word involves understanding both its primary denotative referent (the core concept or entity it points to) and the semantic features (the inherent attributes or properties) that constitute and differentiate that referent's meaning. These two aspects represent distinct, yet complementary, components of literal lexical understanding.
10
From: "Denotative Referent Comprehension"
Split Justification: This split differentiates between the comprehension of denotative meanings that refer to tangible, directly perceivable entities or actions (concrete) versus those that refer to intangible ideas, concepts, or qualities (abstract). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a referent is either physical/perceivable or conceptual/non-perceivable, and together they comprehensively cover all forms of denotative referents.
11
From: "Comprehension of Abstract Referents"
Split Justification: Abstract referents can be fundamentally categorized based on whether they denote inherent qualities, states, or attributes (intrinsic) or connections, interactions, or comparisons between entities or ideas (relational). This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and largely mutually exclusive division for understanding abstract concepts.
12
From: "Abstract Relational Referents"
Split Justification: This dichotomy categorizes abstract relational referents based on whether they describe static attributes, comparisons, and structural relationships between entities or concepts (States and Qualities) or dynamic interactions, causality, and temporal sequences of events (Processes and Events).
✓
Topic: "Relational Referents for States and Qualities" (W5703)