1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the receptive aspects of linguistic reasoning, involving the understanding and interpretation of spoken or written language, from the expressive aspects, which involve the formulation and production of spoken or written language. These are distinct, fundamental processes that together encompass all facets of verbal reasoning.
6
From: "Verbal Expression"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the construction of logically sound arguments (Structuring an Argument) from the use of stylistic and persuasive language to influence an audience (Rhetorical Technique).
7
From: "Structuring an Argument"
Split Justification: An argument's structure can be based on reasoning from general principles to a guaranteed specific conclusion (Deductive Structuring) or from specific observations to a probable generalization (Inductive Structuring).
8
From: "Inductive Structuring"
Split Justification: This dichotomy differentiates between structuring an argument to derive a broad, often universal, principle or law from specific instances (Universal Generalization) versus structuring an argument to conclude a specific fact, cause, or prediction about a particular event or state based on accumulated evidence (Particular Inference). These represent the two distinct types of conclusions and argument structures within inductive reasoning.
9
From: "Universal Generalization"
Split Justification: Universal generalizations, formed through inductive structuring, can fundamentally describe either the inherent characteristics and properties common to all members of a class (attributes) or the universal connections, interactions, and systematic dependencies between entities, classes, or phenomena (relations).
10
From: "Generalization of Attributes"
Split Justification: This split differentiates between attributes that exist independently of human perception or interpretation (objective) and those that are dependent on an individual's experience, feelings, or perspective (subjective). This dichotomy comprehensively covers the full scope of attributes an individual might generalize from specific observations.
11
From: "Generalization of Subjective Attributes"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between subjective attributes that are primarily rooted in emotional states and feelings (affective) versus those that are primarily based on cognitive judgments, appraisals, or preferences (evaluative). Both are subjective, but their fundamental nature and the process of their generalization differ, making them mutually exclusive and comprehensively covering the domain of subjective attributes.
12
From: "Generalization of Evaluative Subjective Attributes"
Split Justification: Evaluative judgments fundamentally assign either a desirable (positive) or undesirable (negative) valence to an attribute, forming a comprehensive and mutually exclusive dichotomy for how such subjective attributes are generalized.
✓
Topic: "Generalization of Positively Valenced Subjective Attributes" (W5719)