1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Kinship and Familial Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between family relationships primarily established through shared ancestry or bloodlines (kinship by descent) and those formed through marriage, adoption, or other social and legal compacts (kinship by alliance). This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of inherent and familial bonds.
6
From: "Kinship by Alliance"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances that establish a spousal or domestic partnership between adults (e.g., marriage, civil unions) and those that establish a parental or guardianship role for an adult towards a child (e.g., adoption, foster care). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a single alliance compact cannot simultaneously be both an adult partnership and a new parent-child bond, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of kinship established through formal compacts.
7
From: "Alliances Establishing Parental/Guardian Roles"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances that establish a new, permanent parent-child relationship with the intention of fully integrating the child into a new family unit (e.g., adoption), and those that establish a temporary or transitional guardianship role, providing care for a child while a more permanent solution is pursued, often with an aim for reunification or placement elsewhere (e.g., foster care, temporary guardianship). These two categories are mutually exclusive as an alliance cannot simultaneously be both permanently integrating and primarily temporary/transitional, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances establishing parental or guardian roles.
8
From: "Alliances for Permanent Parental Integration"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances for permanent parental integration where the child being integrated is already connected to the integrating parent(s) through blood, marriage, or existing household cohabitation (intrafamilial), and those where the child is brought into the family from outside existing familial or household connections (extrafamilial). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a child's prior relationship to the integrating parent(s) is either already established within the broader family or household context or it is not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances for permanent parental integration.
9
From: "Alliances for Extrafamilial Parental Integration"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes the institutional or legal pathway through which an extrafamilial child is permanently integrated into a family. "Alliances via Public Child Welfare Systems" refers to integrations where the state (or a governmental body) is the primary legal custodian of the child, typically after parental rights have been terminated, and facilitates the adoption process. "Alliances via Private or Independent Arrangements" encompasses situations where birth parents voluntarily place a child through a private agency or directly with prospective adoptive parents (often with legal counsel), without the child being in the primary custody of a state's welfare system. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as an extrafamilial integration process operates primarily under either state custody/facilitation or a private/voluntary arrangement, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances for extrafamilial parental integration.
10
From: "Alliances via Public Child Welfare Systems"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances for permanent parental integration facilitated by public child welfare systems where the child is integrated into a family with whom they already had a continuous and established caregiving relationship (e.g., current foster parents, kinship caregivers serving as foster parents), and those where the child is placed with a family newly identified for the purpose of adoption, with whom they had no prior caregiving relationship. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as the integrating family either had a prior established caregiving relationship with the child or they did not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of permanent parental integration alliances facilitated by public child welfare systems.
11
From: "Alliances with Newly Identified Adoptive Families"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes whether the permanent parental integration facilitated by public child welfare systems, involving a newly identified adoptive family, occurs entirely within the legal and geographical boundaries of a single country (domestic) or involves the legal systems and residents of two or more different countries (intercountry). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as an alliance for integration is either entirely national in scope or it crosses national borders, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances for permanent parental integration with newly identified adoptive families via public child welfare systems.
12
From: "Alliances for Intercountry Integration with Newly Identified Adoptive Families"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes intercountry integrations based on whether they adhere to the provisions and safeguards of the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption (a key international legal framework) or operate outside its specific procedural requirements. This provides a mutually exclusive division, as an intercountry integration is either governed by the Hague Convention or it is not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances for intercountry integration with newly identified adoptive families.
✓
Topic: "Alliances for Intercountry Integration under Hague Convention Procedures" (W5808)