1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the receptive aspects of linguistic reasoning, involving the understanding and interpretation of spoken or written language, from the expressive aspects, which involve the formulation and production of spoken or written language. These are distinct, fundamental processes that together encompass all facets of verbal reasoning.
6
From: "Verbal Comprehension"
Split Justification: This split distinguishes between understanding the explicit, directly stated meaning of verbal information and understanding the unstated, implied, or deeper meaning that requires synthesis and deduction. These represent distinct levels of cognitive processing within overall verbal comprehension.
7
From: "Inferential Comprehension"
Split Justification: This split divides inference into understanding unstated social meaning and intent (Pragmatic & Discourse Inference) and evaluating the structural soundness of an argument (Logical Analysis).
8
From: "Pragmatic & Discourse Inference"
Split Justification: This split distinguishes between inferring meaning from social context and speaker intent (Social & Intentional Inference) and inferring meaning from the logical and structural connections within the text itself (Coherence & Structural Inference).
9
From: "Social & Intentional Inference"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the process of inferring the internal cognitive and affective states (e.g., beliefs, desires, intentions) of individual agents from inferring the established norms, roles, relationships, and power dynamics that govern interactions within a social context or group.
10
From: "Inference of Social Structures & Dynamics"
Split Justification: This split differentiates between understanding the stable, patterned arrangements and organizational frameworks within a social system (structures) versus understanding the ongoing processes, interactions, and forces that operate within or across these structures, leading to change or maintaining equilibrium (dynamics). Together, they comprehensively cover the nature and functioning of social reality.
11
From: "Inference of Social Dynamics"
Split Justification: This dichotomy differentiates between the cognitive process of inferring social dynamics as they are currently unfolding or have just occurred (interpreting immediate interactions, causes, and observable progression) and the process of inferring how these dynamics will evolve over time (anticipating future states, trajectories, and potential outcomes). This temporal distinction is fundamental to a comprehensive understanding of any dynamic system.
12
From: "Inference of Future Social Dynamics"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the inference of how social interactions and relationships will evolve at the individual or small-group level (interpersonal) from the inference of how broader societal trends, group behaviors, and systemic structures will change (macrosocial). This distinction covers the full scope of "social dynamics" across different scales of analysis.
✓
Topic: "Inference of Future Interpersonal Dynamics" (W5927)