1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Somatic Sphere"
Split Justification: The Somatic Sphere encompasses all physical aspects of the self. These can be fundamentally divided based on whether they are directly accessible to conscious awareness and subjective experience (e.g., pain, touch, proprioception) or whether they operate autonomously and beneath the threshold of conscious perception (e.g., heart rate, digestion, cellular metabolism). Every bodily sensation, state, or process falls into one of these two categories, making them mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
4
From: "Conscious Somatic Experience"
Split Justification: Conscious somatic experiences can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary focus is on the body's internal condition, physiological state, or spatial configuration (e.g., hunger, proprioception, pain from an organ, fatigue) or whether they are primarily concerned with the body's interaction, contact, or perception of stimuli from the external environment (e.g., touch, temperature, pressure, pain from an external source). These two categories are mutually exclusive as an experience's primary referent is either internal or external to the body's boundary, and comprehensively exhaustive as all conscious somatic experiences fall into one of these two fundamental domains.
5
From: "Awareness of External Bodily Interactions"
Split Justification: ** All conscious somatic experiences focused on external interactions can be fundamentally categorized by whether the body is actively initiating and controlling the interaction with the environment (e.g., touching, grasping, applying pressure, manipulating objects) or whether it is passively receiving stimuli or impacts from the external environment (e.g., being touched, feeling ambient temperature, experiencing external pressure or impact). This distinction precisely separates experiences by the primary locus of agency in the interaction, making the categories mutually exclusive, and together they cover the entire scope of awareness of external bodily interactions, thus being comprehensively exhaustive.
6
From: "Awareness of Passive External Bodily Reception"
Split Justification: All conscious experiences of passive external bodily reception can be fundamentally divided based on whether they arise from direct physical forces causing deformation of the body's surface (e.g., touch, pressure, vibration) or from environmental properties (temperature, chemical presence) and potentially harmful stimuli (pain from external sources, regardless of its primary cause). This creates two categories that are mutually exclusive in their primary sensory modality and comprehensively exhaustive for all such passive receptions.
7
From: "Awareness of External Mechanical Contact"
Split Justification: All conscious experiences of external mechanical contact can be fundamentally distinguished by whether the mechanical force or deformation is relatively constant and steady over the period of perception (e.g., sustained pressure, an object resting on the skin), or if it involves variability, movement, or change in intensity, frequency, or location over time (e.g., vibration, brushing, light taps, friction). These categories are mutually exclusive, as an external mechanical contact is either perceived as steady or as changing, and together they comprehensively cover all forms of awareness of external mechanical contact.
8
From: "Awareness of Changing External Mechanical Contact"
Split Justification: All conscious experiences of changing external mechanical contact can be fundamentally distinguished by whether the change is primarily due to the physical point of contact moving or shifting across the body's surface (e.g., brushing, sliding), or whether the change is primarily due to the intensity or frequency of the mechanical force varying over time at a relatively stable or fixed point of contact (e.g., vibration, tapping). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as the perceived dynamism originates from either spatial displacement or temporal force fluctuation, and together they comprehensively cover all forms of awareness of changing external mechanical contact.
9
From: "Awareness of Contact Point Displacement"
Split Justification: All conscious experiences of contact point displacement can be fundamentally divided based on whether the perceived movement of the contact point across the body's surface is continuous and unbroken (e.g., sliding, stroking, sustained brushing), or if it is perceived as a sequence of distinct, separate contacts occurring at different points along a path (e.g., a series of light taps moving along the skin, the progression of a crawling insect). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as the displacement is either uninterrupted or segmented into discrete events, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of awareness of contact point displacement.
10
From: "Awareness of Intermittent Contact Movement"
Split Justification: All conscious experiences of intermittent contact movement can be fundamentally divided based on whether the sequence of distinct, separate contacts occurring at different points follows a discernible and predictable pattern in its spatial distribution or temporal rhythm, or if it lacks such a consistent pattern and is perceived as unpredictable or haphazard. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as an intermittent movement's pattern is either perceived as regular or not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of awareness of intermittent contact movement.
11
From: "Awareness of Irregular Intermittent Contact Movement"
Split Justification: All conscious experiences of irregular intermittent contact movement can be fundamentally divided based on whether the perceived intensity or force of the individual discrete contacts in the sequence remains relatively stable, or if it noticeably varies from one contact to the next. This distinction is mutually exclusive, as the force of the contacts within the irregular sequence is either perceived as consistent or variable, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of awareness of irregular intermittent contact movement.
12
From: "Awareness of Irregular Intermittent Contact Movement with Variable Force"
Split Justification: ** All conscious experiences of irregular intermittent contact movement with variable force can be fundamentally divided based on whether the perceived shifts in intensity or force between individual contacts (or within a single contact) are gradual and smooth, or if they are abrupt and sharp. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a change in force is perceived as either gradual or abrupt, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all possible manners in which force can vary within this type of somatic experience.
✓
Topic: "Awareness of Irregular Intermittent Contact Movement with Gradual Force Transitions" (W5977)