1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Pattern Matching & Implicit Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on direct sensory input (e.g., recognizing faces, sounds, immediate environmental threats) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on abstract meaning, categories, semantic knowledge, and higher-level schema (e.g., understanding language, social cues, expert intuition). These two categories delineate distinct levels of information abstraction in pattern processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how pre-existing patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
6
From: "Perceptual Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns derived from external sensory input (e.g., visual scenes, sounds, tactile sensations from the environment) from those derived from internal bodily sensations (e.g., proprioception, interoception, vestibular sense). These two categories comprehensively cover all sources of direct sensory input for pattern processing.
7
From: "Interoceptive & Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on internal physiological states (interoception) from those based on body position, movement, and muscle tension (proprioception). These two categories represent distinct sensory systems within the internal body, comprehensively covering the scope of how these specific types of perceptual patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
8
From: "Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns related to the body's current, relatively stable configuration, posture, and spatial orientation (static) from those related to patterns of movement, sequences, and changes in position over time (dynamic). These two categories comprehensively cover all aspects of proprioceptive information processing, delineating between an 'instantaneous state' and a 'process of change.'
9
From: "Dynamic Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of dynamic proprioceptive patterns related to movements that the body actively generates and controls based on internal motor commands and intentions (self-initiated) from those related to movements that occur as the body adapts, reacts, or compensates for external forces, environmental changes, or interactions with objects (environmentally-responsive). These two categories comprehensively cover all sources and contexts of dynamic proprioceptive information processing, delineating between endogenous and exogenous drivers of movement patterns.
10
From: "Environmentally-Responsive Dynamic Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of dynamic proprioceptive patterns that are primarily responsive to direct external forces acting upon the body (e.g., impacts, pushes, pulls, wind resistance, or ground reactions directly causing instability), from those that are primarily responsive to the spatial, physical, or contextual features and conditions of the environment (e.g., terrain geometry, surface texture, object configurations, or available pathways) to guide and shape movement. These two categories comprehensively cover all ways in which dynamic proprioceptive patterns are activated in response to environmental influences, delineating between managing direct external mechanical action and adapting to static or structural environmental properties.
11
From: "Environmental Feature-Responsive Dynamic Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of dynamic proprioceptive patterns that are primarily responsive to the macroscopic features and structural layout of the environment, influencing whole-body locomotion, balance, and navigation (e.g., adapting gait to uneven terrain, negotiating slopes, following pathways), from those that are primarily responsive to the properties and configurations of discrete objects or tools within the environment, guiding localized interaction and manipulation (e.g., adjusting grip on a tool, maneuvering an object, guiding a kick). These two categories comprehensively cover all ways in which dynamic proprioceptive patterns are activated in response to environmental features, delineating between adapting movement to the overall spatial context versus interacting with specific entities within that context.
12
From: "Object & Tool Interaction Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of dynamic proprioceptive patterns that are primarily responsive to the stable, unyielding physical characteristics of objects and tools (rigid) from those that are primarily responsive to the pliable, shape-changing, or flow-like physical characteristics of objects and tools (deformable). These two categories comprehensively cover the intrinsic material properties of discrete entities that guide distinct proprioceptive patterns for localized interaction and manipulation.
✓
Topic: "Rigid Object & Tool Interaction Proprioceptive Pattern Matching & Activation" (W6115)