1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Quantitative/Logical Reasoning"
Split Justification: Logical reasoning can be strictly formal following rules of inference (**Deductive Proof**) or drawing general conclusions from specific examples (**Inductive Reasoning Case Study**). (L5 Split)
6
From: "Inductive Reasoning Case Study"
Split Justification: Induction involves forming general rules (**Hypothesis Generation**) and testing their predictive power (**Hypothesis Testing**). (L6 Split)
7
From: "Hypothesis Generation"
Split Justification: Generating a hypothesis requires identifying a pattern (**Observing Correlations**) and formulating a testable explanation (**Stating a Falsifiable Claim**).
8
From: "Observing Correlations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the process of identifying relationships based on numerical data and statistical analysis from the process of discerning patterns and connections within non-numerical, descriptive, or categorical information. Together, these two categories comprehensively cover the fundamental modes of observing correlations in any form of data or experience for hypothesis generation.
9
From: "Observing Qualitative Associations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between identifying qualitative associations based on the intrinsic, common attributes or characteristics of the observed elements (e.g., shared themes, categories, or properties), versus identifying associations based on their extrinsic relationships in time, space, or condition (e.g., events happening together, one after another, or one appearing contingent on another).
10
From: "Observing Associations by Co-occurrence or Sequence"
Split Justification: This split directly separates the two distinct modes of observing qualitative associations explicitly mentioned in the parent node: those occurring simultaneously or within the same context (co-occurrence) versus those occurring in a specific temporal order (sequence). These two categories are mutually exclusive in their defining characteristic (simultaneity vs. order) and comprehensively cover the entire scope of the parent concept.
11
From: "Observing Co-occurring Associations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between observing associations where multiple attributes, features, or characteristics appear together as part of a single, unified entity, event, or situation, versus observing associations where separate, distinct entities or events themselves co-occur in time or space. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive split for how qualitative co-occurring associations are observed.
12
From: "Observing Co-occurring Attributes of a Single Entity/Event"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between attributes that are intrinsic and generally stable characteristics of the entity or event (Inherent Properties), and those that represent its temporary, contextual, or transient conditions at the time of observation (Situational States). Together, these two categories comprehensively cover all forms of co-occurring attributes within a single instance.
✓
Topic: "Observing Co-occurring Situational States" (W6543)