1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Pattern Matching & Implicit Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on direct sensory input (e.g., recognizing faces, sounds, immediate environmental threats) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on abstract meaning, categories, semantic knowledge, and higher-level schema (e.g., understanding language, social cues, expert intuition). These two categories delineate distinct levels of information abstraction in pattern processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how pre-existing patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
6
From: "Perceptual Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns derived from external sensory input (e.g., visual scenes, sounds, tactile sensations from the environment) from those derived from internal bodily sensations (e.g., proprioception, interoception, vestibular sense). These two categories comprehensively cover all sources of direct sensory input for pattern processing.
7
From: "Exteroceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns derived from senses that perceive stimuli at a distance (e.g., vision, audition for environmental scanning and distant object recognition) from those that require direct physical contact or very close proximity (e.g., touch, taste, smell for immediate object properties and direct interaction). These two categories comprehensively cover all sources of exteroceptive sensory input by distinguishing between information gathered about the broader, remote environment and information gathered through immediate, close-range interaction with objects or substances.
8
From: "Proximal Exteroceptive Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns derived from proximal senses that detect chemical stimuli (e.g., taste, smell for identifying substances or their presence) from those that detect physical and mechanical stimuli (e.g., touch for identifying textures, pressure, temperature, or physical contact). These two categories comprehensively cover all forms of proximal exteroceptive pattern processing.
9
From: "Chemical Proximal Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns derived from chemical stimuli detected by taste receptors (gustation) from those derived from chemical stimuli detected by olfactory receptors (olfaction). These two distinct chemosensory systems comprehensively cover the scope of proximal chemical pattern processing and activation.
10
From: "Gustatory Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of gustatory patterns that implicitly activate an ingestive response (indicating nutritional benefit or essential compounds) from those that implicitly activate a rejective or avoidance response (indicating potential harm or unsuitability). These two categories comprehensively cover the primary, biologically significant functions of gustatory pattern matching and activation.
11
From: "Gustatory Pattern Matching for Rejective Potential"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of gustatory patterns that primarily signal the presence of intrinsically toxic or poisonous compounds (e.g., bitter tastes associated with alkaloids) from those that signal threats related to environmental degradation (e.g., extreme sourness indicating spoilage or harmful acidity) or osmotic/physiological imbalance (e.g., extreme saltiness). These two categories comprehensively cover the primary distinct forms of biological threat indicated by rejective gustatory patterns.
12
From: "Gustatory Pattern Matching for Direct Toxin Rejection"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of gustatory patterns signaling toxins that are primarily nitrogen-containing organic compounds (e.g., alkaloids) from those signaling toxins that are primarily non-nitrogenous organic compounds (e.g., certain terpenes, saponins, glucosinolates, polyphenols). These two categories comprehensively cover the major chemical classes of intrinsically toxic organic compounds detected by the gustatory system for rejection.
✓
Topic: "Gustatory Pattern Matching for Non-Nitrogenous Organic Toxin Rejection" (W6723)