1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: All human interaction with the non-human world fundamentally involves either the cognitive process of seeking knowledge, meaning, or appreciation from it (e.g., science, observation, art), or the active, practical process of physically altering, shaping, or making use of it for various purposes (e.g., technology, engineering, resource management). These two modes represent distinct primary intentions and outcomes, yet together comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans engage with the non-human realm.
4
From: "Understanding and Interpreting the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: Humans understand and interpret the non-human world either by objectively observing and analyzing its inherent structures, laws, and phenomena to gain factual knowledge, or by subjectively engaging with it to derive aesthetic value, emotional resonance, or existential meaning. These two modes represent distinct intentions and methodologies, yet together comprehensively cover all ways of understanding and interpreting the non-human world.
5
From: "Interpreting Subjective Significance"
Split Justification: Humans interpret subjective significance from the non-human world in two fundamentally distinct ways: either through direct, immediate sensory and emotional engagement (e.g., experiencing beauty, awe, or comfort from nature or art), or through a more reflective, cognitive process of attributing abstract conceptual meaning, often through symbols, narratives, or existential contemplation (e.g., a landscape symbolizing freedom, an artifact representing heritage, the night sky evoking questions of purpose). These two modes are mutually exclusive in their primary focus (immediate reception versus reflective attribution) and comprehensively exhaustive, covering the full spectrum of subjective engagement.
6
From: "Conceptual and Symbolic Meaning Attribution"
Split Justification: Humans attribute abstract conceptual and symbolic meaning to the non-human world through two fundamentally distinct avenues: either by drawing upon established collective human constructs, narratives, traditions, and historical contexts (sociocultural and historical frameworks), or by engaging in deeper, reflective inquiry into universal aspects of existence, purpose, and the human condition that transcend specific cultural bounds (existential and universal contemplation). These two modes are mutually exclusive, as the primary source and nature of the attributed meaning differ (contingent human constructs vs. transcendent philosophical inquiry), and together they comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans assign abstract conceptual and symbolic significance to the non-human world.
7
From: "Meaning from Sociocultural & Historical Frameworks"
Split Justification: Humans attribute meaning to the non-human world through sociocultural and historical frameworks in two fundamentally distinct ways: either primarily from the actively evolving, present-day shared understandings, values, and narratives within a specific society or culture, or predominantly from the accumulated weight of past events, collective memory, and inherited traditions that shape our understanding of heritage. These two modes represent distinct temporal and generative dimensions of collective meaning-making, yet together they comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans derive meaning from established sociocultural and historical frameworks.
8
From: "Meaning from Current Societal & Cultural Constructs"
Split Justification: Humans attribute meaning to the non-human world through current societal and cultural constructs in two fundamentally distinct ways: either through conscious, planned, and often institutionally-driven efforts to shape public understanding and values (deliberate societal constructs like policies, official campaigns, or curated narratives), or through more spontaneous, organic, and often grassroots processes that arise from shared activities, trends, aesthetics, and tacit agreements within a culture (emergent cultural practices like popular trends, memes, or evolving communal rituals). These two modes are mutually exclusive, as they represent distinct mechanisms of generation and dissemination, and together they comprehensively cover the full scope of how current societal and cultural frameworks assign abstract conceptual and symbolic significance to the non-human world.
9
From: "Meaning from Emergent Cultural Practices"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning from emergent cultural practices through two fundamentally distinct avenues: either through the collective adoption and evolution of specific ways of interacting with, using, or engaging with the non-human world (e.g., environmental practices, technological uses, communal rituals), or through the organic spread of shared ideas, symbols, narratives, and aesthetic preferences that shape how the non-human world is perceived, understood, and communicated (e.g., popular aesthetics, symbolic trends, memes). These two modes represent distinct primary forms of cultural emergence—active doing versus collective understanding/perception—and together comprehensively cover the scope of meaning derived from emergent cultural practices.
10
From: "Meaning from Collective Behavioral Practices and Uses"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning from collective behavioral practices and uses of the non-human world either primarily from the intrinsic value of the shared experience, expression, and symbolic acts involved, or predominantly from the extrinsic value of achieving a collective purpose, producing a tangible outcome, or serving a practical function. These two modes represent distinct primary intentions and sources of meaning, yet together they comprehensively cover how groups imbue meaning through their actions and uses of the non-human world.
11
From: "Meaning from Collective Functional & Outcome-Oriented Uses"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning from collective functional and outcome-oriented uses of the non-human world either primarily from the active transformation, extraction, and generation of new resources, goods, or infrastructure to fulfill needs or create value (production and provision), or predominantly from the ongoing oversight, maintenance, protection, and regulation of existing natural environments, resources, or built systems to ensure their sustained functionality, health, or responsible utilization (stewardship and management). These two modes represent distinct primary intentions and types of outcomes, yet together they comprehensively cover the full spectrum of how collectives derive meaning from their functional and outcome-oriented uses of the non-human world.
12
From: "Meaning from Collective Production and Provision"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning from collective production and provision either primarily from the creation or availability of physical goods, infrastructure, or resources (tangible outputs), or predominantly from the delivery or making available of non-physical services, information, or experiences (intangible outputs). These two modes represent distinct types of collective outcomes—physical manifestation versus non-physical benefit—yet together they comprehensively cover the full spectrum of how collectives derive meaning from their functional and outcome-oriented uses of the non-human world.
✓
Topic: "Meaning from Collective Provision of Intangible Outputs" (W6810)