1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Social Systems and Structures"
Split Justification: All social systems and structures can be fundamentally categorized by whether their rules, roles, and organization are explicitly codified, institutionalized, and formally enforced (formal systems), or are unwritten, emergent, culturally embedded, and maintained through custom, tradition, and implicit social pressure (informal systems). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a system's primary mode of operation is either formal or informal, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all aspects of collective human organization.
5
From: "Formal Social Systems"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between the overarching framework of authority, law, and governance that establishes and enforces the primary rules and structures for an entire society (encompassing governmental bodies, legal systems, and core regulatory agencies), and the diverse range of specific, mission-oriented institutions that operate within, and are shaped by, this overarching framework to achieve particular goals, produce goods, or provide services (such as corporations, educational institutions, healthcare systems, or formal non-profits). These categories are mutually exclusive, as an entity is either part of the foundational governance and legal apparatus or a specific purpose-driven organization operating under its purview, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of formal social systems.
6
From: "State, Governance, and Legal Systems"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the active, functional aspects of the state – encompassing the institutions, processes, and personnel responsible for policy formulation, implementation, and the daily administration of public affairs – from the foundational legal and constitutional principles, laws, and judicial systems that define the state's structure, legitimate its power, regulate its operations, and provide mechanisms for justice and dispute resolution. These two aspects are mutually exclusive, as one pertains to the execution of governance and the other to its underlying normative and structural rules, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all components of a state's governance and legal systems.
7
From: "Constitutional Frameworks and Jurisprudence"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the content of the law – which defines the rights, duties, prohibitions, and the foundational structure of governance (including constitutional principles, human rights, and all forms of substantive legislation) – from the mechanisms, procedures, and institutions through which these laws are interpreted, applied, enforced, and disputes are resolved. Substantive law dictates what is permissible or impermissible, while legal process and judicial systems dictate how legal rules operate in practice, providing the forums and methods for justice and dispute resolution. This ensures mutual exclusivity, distinguishing between the "what" of the law and the "how" and "who" of its application, and comprehensiveness, covering all aspects of foundational legal principles, specific laws, and judicial systems as defined in the parent node's derivation.
8
From: "Substantive Law and Rights"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates substantive legal principles and rights based on the primary relationship they regulate. Public law defines the structure, powers, and limits of the state, governing its relationship with citizens and entities, and enshrining fundamental constitutional rights (e.g., constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law). Private law, conversely, governs the relationships, rights, and obligations solely between individuals and private entities, without direct state involvement as a party (e.g., contract law, property law, tort law, family law). This division is mutually exclusive, as a substantive legal principle or right primarily concerns either the state-individual dynamic or the individual-individual/entity dynamic, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all aspects of substantive law and rights.
9
From: "Private Law and Individual Obligations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates private legal obligations based on their primary origin: whether they stem from the explicit or implicit consent and agreement between parties, or whether they are imposed by law due to specific circumstances, status, or actions, independently of consent. This division is mutually exclusive, as an obligation either originates from an agreement or it does not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of private law obligations.
10
From: "Obligations Arising from Agreement"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates obligations arising from agreements where the terms, conditions, and mutual assent of the parties are explicitly articulated, either orally or in writing, from those where the agreement, its specific terms, or the mutual assent itself is not overtly stated but rather inferred or presumed from the parties' conduct, their relationship, customs, or the surrounding circumstances. This division is mutually exclusive, as the foundational basis for understanding an agreement's existence and terms is either explicit articulation or implicit inference, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms in which private legal obligations can arise from agreement.
11
From: "Implied Agreements and Obligations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates obligations arising where the entire contractual relationship and its primary terms are inferred solely from the parties' conduct, actions, and surrounding circumstances, from obligations where a primary, explicit agreement exists, but specific unstated terms are understood to be part of that agreement due to custom, business efficacy, or inferred mutual intent. These categories are mutually exclusive, as an implied obligation either constitutes the entirety of the agreement or is a specific term within an existing express agreement, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of obligations arising from agreements inferred from unstated mutual assent, consistent with the derivation of the parent node.
12
From: "Obligations from Wholly Inferred Agreements"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates obligations arising from wholly inferred agreements based on the primary nature of the benefit or performance implicitly agreed upon: whether it involves the provision of actions, expertise, or labor without transferring ownership of a distinct physical item (services), or whether it involves the transfer of ownership, possession, or temporary use of tangible assets, whether movable goods or real property. These categories are mutually exclusive, as an inferred agreement's primary subject matter is either services or tangible assets/their use, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of obligations arising from wholly inferred agreements.
✓
Topic: "Obligations from Wholly Inferred Agreements for Goods and Property Use" (W6820)