1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Chosen and Affinitive Relationships"
Split Justification: All chosen and affinitive relationships can be fundamentally categorized by the presence or absence of a romantic and/or sexual dimension. This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a relationship either encompasses these elements or it does not, and it is comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of chosen bonds from intimate romantic partnerships to platonic friendships, mentorships, and other volitional connections based on shared interests or values.
6
From: "Romantic and Sexual Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between relationships characterized by a significant, often explicitly agreed-upon, investment in a shared future, emotional depth, and defined partnership (e.g., marriage, long-term cohabitation) versus those relationships that are primarily focused on present enjoyment, exploration, or short-term connection without a mutual commitment to a long-term future or defined partnership. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division, accounting for the full spectrum of romantic and sexual bonds from one-time encounters to lifelong unions.
7
From: "Committed Romantic and Sexual Relationships"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes committed romantic and sexual relationships based on whether the primary commitment to emotional, romantic, and/or sexual exclusivity is solely between two individuals, or whether it encompasses or allows for multiple, equally valid romantic and/or sexual partners within the scope of the committed relationship. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division of all committed romantic and sexual relationships based on their intrinsic relational structure regarding exclusivity and the number of primary participants.
8
From: "Monogamous Committed Romantic and Sexual Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes monogamous committed romantic and sexual relationships based on whether their committed status is formally recognized by societal, legal, or religious institutions (e.g., marriage, civil union), or if the commitment, while profound and enduring, exists primarily through the mutual agreement and practice of the partners without such external formal recognition (e.g., long-term cohabitation without legal union, de facto partnerships). This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division, accounting for all forms of monogamous committed relationships based on their public and institutional status.
9
From: "Formally Recognized Monogamous Committed Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes formally recognized monogamous committed relationships based on whether the primary decision-making and initiative for the union stem from the mutual autonomous choice and free will of the partners themselves, or whether they are primarily determined, brokered, or facilitated by external parties (such as families, community leaders, or matchmakers), with the partners' eventual consent or participation. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive distinction covering the two main modes of formation for such formally recognized bonds.
10
From: "Autonomously Chosen Formal Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes autonomously chosen formal relationships based on whether their primary purpose and trajectory are significantly shaped by the intent, presence, or raising of children (biological or adopted), or if the relationship's core focus remains primarily on the shared life, growth, and experiences of the two partners as a dyad, independent of a parental role. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division, accounting for the two major life paths and orientations within such committed partnerships.
11
From: "Relationships Orienting Towards Family Formation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes relationships orienting towards family formation based on whether their primary focus and pathway for bringing children into the family unit is through the procreation of new life originating from the partners (whether naturally or via assisted reproduction using their own gametes), or through the integration of children already in existence or originating from external sources (such as adoption, fostering, becoming step-parents, or surrogacy involving donor gametes). This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division of the two main modes of family formation within these committed partnerships.
12
From: "Relationships Primarily Oriented Towards Integrating Existing Children"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally categorizes relationships oriented towards integrating existing children based on whether the child already has an established, direct parental connection (biological, adoptive, or legal) to one of the partners in the committed relationship prior to their integration into the current family unit, or if the child is integrated into the family without such a pre-existing parental connection to either partner. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division, addressing the two primary structural contexts for integrating existing children into these committed partnerships.
✓
Topic: "Relationships Integrating Children Without a Pre-existing Parental Connection to Either Partner" (W7176)