1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Kinship and Familial Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between family relationships primarily established through shared ancestry or bloodlines (kinship by descent) and those formed through marriage, adoption, or other social and legal compacts (kinship by alliance). This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of inherent and familial bonds.
6
From: "Kinship by Alliance"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances that establish a spousal or domestic partnership between adults (e.g., marriage, civil unions) and those that establish a parental or guardianship role for an adult towards a child (e.g., adoption, foster care). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a single alliance compact cannot simultaneously be both an adult partnership and a new parent-child bond, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of kinship established through formal compacts.
7
From: "Alliances Establishing Parental/Guardian Roles"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances that establish a new, permanent parent-child relationship with the intention of fully integrating the child into a new family unit (e.g., adoption), and those that establish a temporary or transitional guardianship role, providing care for a child while a more permanent solution is pursued, often with an aim for reunification or placement elsewhere (e.g., foster care, temporary guardianship). These two categories are mutually exclusive as an alliance cannot simultaneously be both permanently integrating and primarily temporary/transitional, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances establishing parental or guardian roles.
8
From: "Alliances for Permanent Parental Integration"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances for permanent parental integration where the child being integrated is already connected to the integrating parent(s) through blood, marriage, or existing household cohabitation (intrafamilial), and those where the child is brought into the family from outside existing familial or household connections (extrafamilial). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a child's prior relationship to the integrating parent(s) is either already established within the broader family or household context or it is not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances for permanent parental integration.
9
From: "Alliances for Intrafamilial Parental Integration"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between intrafamilial parental integration where the new parental role is established primarily through the integrating adult forming a new spousal or domestic partnership with an existing parent of the child, versus situations where the new parental role is established by an adult who is already an existing relative of the child but not through a new spousal bond with an existing parent. These categories are mutually exclusive, as the primary basis for the new alliance is either a new spousal/partner relationship with an existing parent or it is a pre-existing non-spousal familial relationship, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of alliances for intrafamilial parental integration.
10
From: "Alliances for Parental Integration by Other Existing Kin"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between intrafamilial parental integration where the new parental role is established by an adult who is an existing direct-line relative of the child (e.g., a grandparent) and situations where the new parental role is established by an adult who is an existing collateral-line relative of the child (e.g., an aunt/uncle or older sibling). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a kinship relationship is either along the direct ascendant/descendant line or it is a collateral branch from a common ancestor, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of parental integration by other existing kin.
11
From: "Alliances for Parental Integration by Direct-Line Kin"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between parental integration by grandparents, who are the direct-line ascendant kin one generation removed from the child's original parent(s), and parental integration by all other direct-line kin who are two or more generations removed (e.g., great-grandparents). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a direct-line relative is either a grandparent or a more distant direct-line kin, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of parental integration by direct-line kin.
12
From: "Alliances for Parental Integration by More Distant Direct-Line Kin"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between parental integration by great-grandparents, who are direct-line ascendant kin two generations removed from the child's original parent(s), and parental integration by all other direct-line kin who are three or more generations removed. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a direct-line relative is either a great-grandparent or a more distant direct-line kin, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of parental integration by more distant direct-line kin.
✓
Topic: "Alliances for Parental Integration by Kin Three or More Generations Removed" (W7472)