1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Novel Connection & Insight Generation"
Split Justification: Novel Connection & Insight Generation fundamentally serves two distinct, exhaustive purposes: either to deepen comprehension and reveal latent truths about existing concepts or phenomena (understanding), or to produce new ideas, solutions, or expressions that did not previously exist (creation/innovation). An insight is primarily oriented towards one of these two outcomes.
6
From: "Insight for Generative Innovation"
Split Justification: Insight for Generative Innovation can be fundamentally differentiated by its primary purpose: either to produce new ideas, solutions, or methods to address practical problems and enhance functionality (utilitarian), or to create novel forms, expressions, and experiences that expand human perception, aesthetics, or understanding for their intrinsic value (expressive/experiential). These two categories are distinct and collectively cover the scope of generative innovation.
7
From: "Innovation for Expressive and Experiential Creation"
Split Justification: ** Innovation for Expressive and Experiential Creation can be fundamentally differentiated by the primary mode of recipient engagement it is designed to evoke: either through internal reflection and aesthetic appreciation of a structured, often fixed, form, or through direct, multi-sensory involvement and interaction within a dynamic environment or event. These two modes are distinct and collectively cover the scope of expressive and experiential innovation.
8
From: "Contemplative Aesthetic Creation"
Split Justification: Contemplative aesthetic creations either evoke internal reflection and aesthetic appreciation primarily through the depiction of recognizable subjects, narratives, or symbolic representations that invite interpretation and connection to a referent, or they achieve this effect through the pure arrangement of abstract elements (form, color, sound, rhythm) that engage the senses and emotions directly, without relying on external representation. These two approaches are distinct and comprehensively cover the scope of contemplative aesthetic creation.
9
From: "Contemplation via Depicted Reality or Narrative"
Split Justification: Contemplation via Depicted Reality or Narrative can be fundamentally differentiated by whether the primary subject matter is grounded in verifiable or plausible human experience and the concrete world, or if it intentionally constructs or refers to symbolic, mythic, or entirely imagined realms to evoke reflection. These two modes are distinct and collectively cover the scope of narrative and representational forms for contemplation.
10
From: "Contemplation via Depiction of Symbolic, Mythic, or Imagined Realities"
Split Justification: The contemplation evoked by symbolic, mythic, or imagined realities can be fundamentally differentiated by whether the depicted reality primarily draws upon established, shared cultural narratives, archetypes, or universal symbolic patterns, or if it primarily constructs entirely novel fictional narratives, unique speculative worlds, or self-contained symbolic systems. These two modes are distinct in their origin of meaning and collectively cover the scope of the parent concept.
11
From: "Contemplation via Depiction of Collective Mythic and Archetypal Patterns"
Split Justification: Contemplation via Depiction of Collective Mythic and Archetypal Patterns can be fundamentally differentiated by whether these patterns are primarily conveyed through extended narrative structures that unfold over time (stories, epics, sagas) or through condensed, static symbolic forms (icons, emblems, visual motifs) that encapsulate a core meaning. These two modes are distinct in their presentation and collectively cover the scope of depicting collective mythic and archetypal patterns for contemplation.
12
From: "Contemplation via Iconic Depictions of Archetypes and Symbols"
Split Justification: The contemplation evoked by iconic depictions of archetypes and symbols can be fundamentally differentiated by whether the depiction primarily features recognizable figures (beings, entities, or characters) that embody archetypal roles or traits, or if it primarily utilizes abstract forms, geometric patterns, or non-representational motifs to convey symbolic meaning. These two modes are distinct in their visual language and collectively cover the scope of iconic archetypal and symbolic contemplation.
✓
Topic: "Contemplation via Iconic Depiction of Abstract Archetypal Forms and Patterns" (W7483)