1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: All human interaction with the non-human world fundamentally involves either the cognitive process of seeking knowledge, meaning, or appreciation from it (e.g., science, observation, art), or the active, practical process of physically altering, shaping, or making use of it for various purposes (e.g., technology, engineering, resource management). These two modes represent distinct primary intentions and outcomes, yet together comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans engage with the non-human realm.
4
From: "Understanding and Interpreting the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: Humans understand and interpret the non-human world either by objectively observing and analyzing its inherent structures, laws, and phenomena to gain factual knowledge, or by subjectively engaging with it to derive aesthetic value, emotional resonance, or existential meaning. These two modes represent distinct intentions and methodologies, yet together comprehensively cover all ways of understanding and interpreting the non-human world.
5
From: "Understanding Objective Realities"
Split Justification: Humans understand objective realities either through empirical investigation of the physical and biological world and its governing laws, or through the deductive exploration of abstract structures, logical rules, and mathematical principles. These two domains represent fundamentally distinct methodologies and objects of study, yet together encompass all forms of objective understanding of non-human reality.
6
From: "Understanding Formal Systems and Principles"
Split Justification: Humans understand formal systems and principles either by focusing on the abstract study of quantity, structure, space, and change (e.g., arithmetic, geometry, algebra, calculus), or by focusing on the abstract study of reasoning, inference, truth, algorithms, and information processing (e.g., formal logic, theoretical computer science). These two domains represent distinct yet exhaustive categories of formal inquiry.
7
From: "Understanding Mathematical Principles"
Split Justification: Humans understand mathematical principles either by exploring their inherent abstract properties, axioms, and logical consistency for their own sake (pure mathematics), or by developing and applying these principles to create models that describe, predict, and control phenomena in the natural and human-made worlds (applied mathematics). These two approaches represent distinct primary aims in the pursuit of mathematical understanding, yet together they comprehensively cover the full spectrum of how mathematical principles are understood.
8
From: "Understanding Intrinsic Mathematical Structures"
Split Justification: Intrinsic mathematical structures are fundamentally understood either as composed of distinct, separable elements with discrete properties (e.g., integers, graphs, sets, permutations), or as possessing unbroken, infinitely divisible qualities involving notions of limits, proximity, and continuity (e.g., real numbers, functions, topological spaces). This distinction is a foundational dichotomy in pure mathematics, categorizing the very nature of the objects and systems studied.
9
From: "Understanding Continuous Mathematical Structures"
Split Justification: ** Understanding continuous mathematical structures fundamentally involves examining their properties either at an arbitrarily small scale or point-wise (local), or considering their overall characteristics spanning the entire domain or structure (global). Local properties describe behavior in the immediate vicinity (e.g., differentiability, continuity at a point), while global properties describe large-scale or overarching characteristics (e.g., compactness, connectedness, definite integrals). This distinction between localized behavior and comprehensive, large-scale attributes is foundational to fields like analysis, topology, and differential geometry, and together these two perspectives exhaustively cover the study of continuous properties.
10
From: "Understanding Global Properties of Continuous Structures"
Split Justification: ** Understanding global properties of continuous structures fundamentally involves examining either their qualitative, shape-preserving attributes that are invariant under continuous deformations (e.g., topological properties like connectedness, compactness, fundamental groups), or their quantitative, measurable attributes that depend on a defined metric or measure (e.g., properties like length, area, volume, total curvature, or definite integrals). These two approaches are mutually exclusive in their foundational definitions and together comprehensively cover the primary ways humans understand the large-scale characteristics of continuous mathematical structures.
11
From: "Understanding Topological Global Properties"
Split Justification: ** Humans understand topological global properties either by examining the direct, set-theoretic attributes of a space, such as its connectivity, compactness, and separation properties, which describe its overall structure and completeness; or by utilizing derived algebraic structures (e.g., groups, rings) that act as invariants to quantify and classify 'holes' or 'voids' within the space, such as its fundamental group or homology groups. These two distinct frameworks together comprehensively cover the primary ways topological global properties are understood.
12
From: "Understanding Algebraic Topological Invariants"
Split Justification: ** Humans understand algebraic topological invariants either by studying homotopy properties, which focus on paths, loops, and their continuous deformations within a space, leading to invariants like fundamental groups and higher homotopy groups; or by studying homology and cohomology properties, which focus on cycles, boundaries, and chain complexes, leading to invariants like homology groups and cohomology rings. These two frameworks represent the primary distinct foundational approaches within algebraic topology for deriving algebraic invariants, and together they comprehensively cover the ways such invariants are understood.
✓
Topic: "Understanding Homology and Cohomology Invariants" (W7570)