1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Chosen and Affinitive Relationships"
Split Justification: All chosen and affinitive relationships can be fundamentally categorized by the presence or absence of a romantic and/or sexual dimension. This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a relationship either encompasses these elements or it does not, and it is comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of chosen bonds from intimate romantic partnerships to platonic friendships, mentorships, and other volitional connections based on shared interests or values.
6
From: "Romantic and Sexual Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between relationships characterized by a significant, often explicitly agreed-upon, investment in a shared future, emotional depth, and defined partnership (e.g., marriage, long-term cohabitation) versus those relationships that are primarily focused on present enjoyment, exploration, or short-term connection without a mutual commitment to a long-term future or defined partnership. This provides a comprehensive and mutually exclusive division, accounting for the full spectrum of romantic and sexual bonds from one-time encounters to lifelong unions.
7
From: "Casual Romantic and Sexual Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes casual romantic and sexual relationships based on the primary nature of the connection: either it is exclusively or predominantly focused on sexual activity without significant romantic intent or development, or it involves a discernible romantic interest, emotional connection, or dating dynamic, even without a commitment to a long-term future. This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division, as any casual romantic and sexual relationship will primarily fall into one of these two categories based on the presence and emphasis of romantic elements.
8
From: "Purely Sexual Casual Connections"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes purely sexual casual connections based on their temporal nature: whether they are singular, isolated instances between individuals, or if they involve repeated sexual encounters with the same person over time without developing into a committed or significantly romantic relationship. This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division, as any such connection will inherently fall into one of these two categories.
9
From: "Recurring Sexual Connections"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes recurring purely sexual connections based on the presence or absence of a standing understanding or arrangement that facilitates their recurrence. "Ad-Hoc Recurring Sexual Connections" occur opportunistically, with each instance initiated independently without a pre-existing dynamic for ongoing sexual availability. "Established Recurring Sexual Arrangements" operate under an implicit or explicit understanding or agreement for ongoing sexual availability between the individuals, even if still casual and purely sexual in nature. This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division, as any recurring purely sexual connection will either be governed by such an arrangement or it will occur on an ad-hoc basis.
10
From: "Established Recurring Sexual Arrangements"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes established recurring sexual arrangements based on whether the explicit or implicit understanding between the individuals restricts their sexual activity to each other (exclusive) or permits engaging in sexual activity with other partners (non-exclusive). This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division, as any such arrangement will inherently possess one of these two defining characteristics regarding its scope of sexual partners.
11
From: "Exclusive Established Recurring Sexual Arrangements"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes exclusive established recurring sexual arrangements based on how the terms, boundaries, and nature of the arrangement have been communicated and understood. "Explicitly Defined Exclusive Established Recurring Sexual Arrangements" refers to situations where there has been a direct conversation, discussion, or overt agreement about the exclusivity, recurrence, and casual, non-romantic nature of the sexual interactions. "Implicitly Understood Exclusive Established Recurring Sexual Arrangements" refers to situations where these parameters are understood and respected by both parties without having been directly discussed or verbally agreed upon, having instead emerged through shared behavior, unspoken cues, and context. This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division, as any established understanding will inherently have been formed either through explicit communication or implicit understanding.
12
From: "Implicitly Understood Exclusive Established Recurring Sexual Arrangements"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes implicitly understood exclusive established recurring sexual arrangements based on the primary origin of the shared implicit understanding between the individuals. One category refers to arrangements where the implicit understanding of the arrangement's terms (exclusivity, recurrence, casual, purely sexual nature) largely stems from commonly accepted social conventions, cultural scripts, or generalized expectations for such relationships. The other category encompasses arrangements where the implicit understanding is primarily built upon the unique history of interactions, specific non-verbal cues, and shared behaviors developed organically within that particular dyad, independent of broader societal blueprints. This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division, as the foundational basis for any shared implicit understanding will predominantly reside in either widely accepted cultural patterns or the idiosyncratic dynamics of the specific relationship.
✓
Topic: "Implicitly Understood via Dyadic Cues and History" (W7592)