1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Pattern Matching & Implicit Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on direct sensory input (e.g., recognizing faces, sounds, immediate environmental threats) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on abstract meaning, categories, semantic knowledge, and higher-level schema (e.g., understanding language, social cues, expert intuition). These two categories delineate distinct levels of information abstraction in pattern processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how pre-existing patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
6
From: "Conceptual Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on abstract factual knowledge, semantic networks, and categories (knowing 'what' things are) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on skills, rules, and action sequences (knowing 'how' to do things). These two categories delineate distinct forms of conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
7
From: "Procedural Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual procedural patterns (skills, rules, action sequences) that are primarily directed towards orchestrating physical actions, movements, or interactions within the external environment, from those that are primarily directed towards orchestrating internal mental operations, transformations, or cognitive strategies within the mind. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how 'knowing how' is implicitly activated and applied, either in the external world or within one's own cognitive processes.
8
From: "External Procedural Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual procedural patterns (skills, rules, action sequences) directed towards orchestrating physical actions, movements, or interactions within the external environment, into those primarily focused on interaction and coordination with other sentient beings or social systems, and those primarily focused on interaction with, and manipulation of, inanimate objects, tools, or the physical environment itself. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how external procedural 'knowing how' is implicitly activated.
9
From: "Physical Manipulation Procedural Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates procedural patterns (skills, rules, action sequences) concerning the rapid, automatic identification and utilization of knowledge for changing the location, orientation, or relative spatial arrangement of inanimate objects or oneself within the environment, from those concerning the rapid, automatic identification and utilization of knowledge for altering the intrinsic properties, structure, or composition of inanimate objects, or assembling them into new functional entities. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how physical manipulation procedures are implicitly activated.
10
From: "Procedural Activation for Material and Form Alteration"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates procedural patterns focused on altering material and form by combining or synthesizing distinct components or substances to create a new, unified entity or composition, from those focused on modifying the physical properties, internal structure, or existing form of an already singular body of material. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as an action either primarily integrates separate elements (assembly/composite formation) or transforms a continuous one (transformation/shaping), and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all means of material and form alteration.
11
From: "Procedural Activation for Component Assembly and Composite Formation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates procedural patterns (skills, rules, action sequences) focused on combining distinct, pre-formed, physical elements into a larger structure where the individual components largely retain their individual boundaries and structural identity, from those focused on synthesizing or blending distinct substances or raw materials into a new, often homogeneous or uniformly structured, composite where the original distinctness of the inputs is dissolved or transformed into a new material entity. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as an action either primarily integrates identifiable individual units or forms a new material by merging substances, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all means of combining distinct components or substances.
12
From: "Procedural Activation for Material Synthesis and Blending"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates procedural patterns focused on combining distinct substances or raw materials through physical means (e.g., dissolving, emulsifying, uniform mixing, forming solutions or homogeneous mixtures) where the chemical identity of the inputs is retained but their physical distinctness is dissolved into a new, often homogeneous or uniformly structured composite, from those focused on combining distinct substances through chemical reactions (e.g., synthesis, polymerization, decomposition followed by re-combination) where the chemical identity of the inputs is transformed into entirely new molecular entities. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as an action either primarily involves physical rearrangement without altering molecular structure or primarily involves the formation of new chemical bonds, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all fundamental means by which the distinctness of inputs is dissolved or transformed into a new material entity.
✓
Topic: "Procedural Activation for Chemical Synthesis of Materials" (W7603)