1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: All human interaction with the non-human world fundamentally involves either the cognitive process of seeking knowledge, meaning, or appreciation from it (e.g., science, observation, art), or the active, practical process of physically altering, shaping, or making use of it for various purposes (e.g., technology, engineering, resource management). These two modes represent distinct primary intentions and outcomes, yet together comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans engage with the non-human realm.
4
From: "Understanding and Interpreting the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: Humans understand and interpret the non-human world either by objectively observing and analyzing its inherent structures, laws, and phenomena to gain factual knowledge, or by subjectively engaging with it to derive aesthetic value, emotional resonance, or existential meaning. These two modes represent distinct intentions and methodologies, yet together comprehensively cover all ways of understanding and interpreting the non-human world.
5
From: "Interpreting Subjective Significance"
Split Justification: Humans interpret subjective significance from the non-human world in two fundamentally distinct ways: either through direct, immediate sensory and emotional engagement (e.g., experiencing beauty, awe, or comfort from nature or art), or through a more reflective, cognitive process of attributing abstract conceptual meaning, often through symbols, narratives, or existential contemplation (e.g., a landscape symbolizing freedom, an artifact representing heritage, the night sky evoking questions of purpose). These two modes are mutually exclusive in their primary focus (immediate reception versus reflective attribution) and comprehensively exhaustive, covering the full spectrum of subjective engagement.
6
From: "Conceptual and Symbolic Meaning Attribution"
Split Justification: Humans attribute abstract conceptual and symbolic meaning to the non-human world through two fundamentally distinct avenues: either by drawing upon established collective human constructs, narratives, traditions, and historical contexts (sociocultural and historical frameworks), or by engaging in deeper, reflective inquiry into universal aspects of existence, purpose, and the human condition that transcend specific cultural bounds (existential and universal contemplation). These two modes are mutually exclusive, as the primary source and nature of the attributed meaning differ (contingent human constructs vs. transcendent philosophical inquiry), and together they comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans assign abstract conceptual and symbolic significance to the non-human world.
7
From: "Meaning from Existential & Universal Contemplation"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning from existential and universal contemplation of the non-human world by either focusing on its implications for the human condition, purpose, and experience within the broader cosmic or universal scheme (e.g., mortality, significance, freedom), or by focusing on the non-human world itself as a revelation of ultimate reality, fundamental cosmic laws, or the inherent nature of existence (e.g., universal order, metaphysical truths, cosmic origins). These two approaches are mutually exclusive in their primary focus (anthropocentric vs. cosmocentric/ontological) and comprehensively exhaustive, covering the full spectrum of deriving meaning from existential and universal contemplation.
8
From: "Meaning concerning the Human Condition in Universal Context"
Split Justification: ** Humans derive meaning about their condition in a universal context by either focusing on the inherent limitations, vulnerabilities, and burdens of existence (e.g., mortality, finitude, suffering, cosmic insignificance) or by focusing on the capacities, potential, and aspirations that allow for agency, purpose, and transcendence within that same universal scheme (e.g., freedom, meaning-making, ethical responsibility, spiritual growth). These two perspectives are mutually exclusive, representing distinct poles of existential reflection (what constrains us vs. what elevates us), and together they comprehensively cover the full spectrum of meaning derived from contemplating the human condition in its universal context.
9
From: "Meaning concerning Human Agency, Purpose, and Transcendent Capacity"
Split Justification: Human agency, purpose, and transcendent capacity, when contemplated through the non-human world in a universal context, can be understood either as continuous processes of active engagement, striving, and unfolding (the dynamic exercise and development of these capacities), or as the achieved states, ultimate fulfillments, or realized potentials related to them (their realization and fulfillment). These two perspectives are mutually exclusive, representing distinct modes of experiencing or interpreting these expansive human qualities (the ongoing journey versus the attained state), and together they comprehensively cover the full spectrum of meaning derived from contemplating human agency, purpose, and transcendent capacity.
10
From: "Meaning concerning the Realization and Fulfillment of Human Capacities"
Split Justification: Humans interpret the realization and fulfillment of their capacities (agency, purpose, transcendent capacity) either as a profound, subjective internal state of being (e.g., inner peace, self-actualization, deep wisdom, spiritual unity) or as a concrete, objective manifestation or impact in the external world (e.g., significant accomplishment, lasting contribution, creative legacy). These two modes are mutually exclusive in their primary locus of fulfillment (internal experience versus external expression/effect) and together comprehensively cover the full spectrum of how these capacities are realized and fulfilled.
11
From: "Meaning concerning Inner Actualization and Subjective Wholeness"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning about inner actualization and subjective wholeness either by focusing on the integration, harmony, and optimal functioning of the individual self, leading to a sense of personal completeness and well-being (e.g., inner peace, self-actualization as personal integration), or by focusing on the expansion or dissolution of the individual self's boundaries to achieve connection and unity with something greater than oneself, often leading to profound insight or spiritual experience (e.g., spiritual unity, deep wisdom as cosmic consciousness). These two approaches are mutually exclusive in their primary locus of subjective wholeness (self-contained vs. self-transcendent) and comprehensively exhaustive, covering the full spectrum of deriving meaning concerning inner actualization and subjective wholeness.
12
From: "Meaning concerning Transcendent Unity and Universal Connection"
Split Justification: Humans derive meaning concerning transcendent unity and universal connection by either focusing on an ultimate reality, principle, or consciousness understood as sacred, divine, or spiritual, or by focusing on an ultimate reality, order, or system understood as impersonal, natural, and immanent (e.g., the physical cosmos, ecological systems). These two perspectives are mutually exclusive in their primary ontological characterization of the 'greater than self' entity (sacred/spiritual vs. impersonal/natural) and comprehensively exhaustive, covering the full spectrum of how humans achieve transcendent unity and universal connection.
✓
Topic: "Meaning concerning Universal Connection with Impersonal or Natural Order" (W7610)