1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Pattern Matching & Implicit Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on direct sensory input (e.g., recognizing faces, sounds, immediate environmental threats) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on abstract meaning, categories, semantic knowledge, and higher-level schema (e.g., understanding language, social cues, expert intuition). These two categories delineate distinct levels of information abstraction in pattern processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how pre-existing patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
6
From: "Conceptual Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on abstract factual knowledge, semantic networks, and categories (knowing 'what' things are) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on skills, rules, and action sequences (knowing 'how' to do things). These two categories delineate distinct forms of conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
7
From: "Declarative Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on general knowledge, facts, and concepts independent of specific personal experience (e.g., knowing the capital of France) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on specific past events, personal experiences, and their associated contexts (e.g., recalling details of a specific birthday party). These two categories delineate distinct forms of declarative conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
8
From: "Episodic Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the objective factual details, sequences, and descriptive elements of specific past events (e.g., recognizing that a current situation mirrors the actions or context of a past personal experience) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the subjective emotional states, sensations, and personal significance associated with those specific past events (e.g., recognizing that a current situation evokes the same feelings or reactions as a past personal experience). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how patterns from personal past events are implicitly identified and activated.
9
From: "Activation of Event-Content Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the static entities, attributes, and relationships that comprised a specific past event (e.g., recognizing the specific people, objects, or locations from a past experience) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the dynamic actions, interactions, and temporal sequences that unfolded within that event (e.g., recognizing the particular steps or flow of an action sequence from a past experience). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of objective factual details, sequences, and descriptive elements of specific past events.
10
From: "Activation of Event-Element Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns whose primary content relates to the discrete, individuated entities that actively comprise or are present within a past event (e.g., specific people, objects, animals, their attributes, and relationships between them) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns whose primary content relates to the encompassing spatio-temporal and circumstantial framework of that event (e.g., specific locations, times, environmental conditions, their attributes, and relationships between them). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of static entities, attributes, and relationships comprising specific past events.
11
From: "Activation of Event-Context Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns related to the specific physical environment, setting, or location of a past event (including its attributes and conditions) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns related to the specific chronological period, duration, or timing of a past event (including its attributes and conditions). These two categories comprehensively cover the encompassing spatio-temporal and circumstantial framework of an event, as circumstantial factors (e.g., environmental conditions) are fundamentally descriptive attributes of either the spatial or temporal context, or their interaction.
12
From: "Activation of Event-Temporal Context Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns related to the intrinsic temporal characteristics of a past event itself, such as its specific point in time, duration, or period (e.g., "morning," "brief," "in the 90s"), from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns related to the relational ordering or sequence of a past event with respect to other events, actions, or states (e.g., "before X," "after Y," "simultaneously"). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of an event's chronological period, duration, or timing by distinguishing between its inherent temporal attributes and its temporal relationships within a larger flow of time.
✓
Topic: "Activation of Event-Temporal Sequence Patterns" (W7763)