1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Novel Connection & Insight Generation"
Split Justification: Novel Connection & Insight Generation fundamentally serves two distinct, exhaustive purposes: either to deepen comprehension and reveal latent truths about existing concepts or phenomena (understanding), or to produce new ideas, solutions, or expressions that did not previously exist (creation/innovation). An insight is primarily oriented towards one of these two outcomes.
6
From: "Insight for Generative Innovation"
Split Justification: Insight for Generative Innovation can be fundamentally differentiated by its primary purpose: either to produce new ideas, solutions, or methods to address practical problems and enhance functionality (utilitarian), or to create novel forms, expressions, and experiences that expand human perception, aesthetics, or understanding for their intrinsic value (expressive/experiential). These two categories are distinct and collectively cover the scope of generative innovation.
7
From: "Innovation for Expressive and Experiential Creation"
Split Justification: ** Innovation for Expressive and Experiential Creation can be fundamentally differentiated by the primary mode of recipient engagement it is designed to evoke: either through internal reflection and aesthetic appreciation of a structured, often fixed, form, or through direct, multi-sensory involvement and interaction within a dynamic environment or event. These two modes are distinct and collectively cover the scope of expressive and experiential innovation.
8
From: "Immersive Participatory Creation"
Split Justification: Immersive Participatory Creation fundamentally involves direct engagement, and this engagement is primarily focused either on interacting with the structured elements, rules, and sensory aspects of a designed environment or system, or on dynamic engagement with other individuals and their collective interplay within the immersive context. These two primary foci comprehensively cover the nature of active participation within such creations.
9
From: "Immersive Interaction with Systemic and Environmental Constructs"
Split Justification: ** Immersive interaction with systemic and environmental constructs is fundamentally differentiated by whether the primary mode of engagement is directed towards actively altering, shaping, or controlling the state and components of the constructed system or environment, or towards experientially discovering, navigating, and building understanding of its pre-existing properties, rules, and spatial organization.
10
From: "Immersive Modification of Constructed Systems and Environments"
Split Justification: Immersive modification of constructed systems and environments fundamentally involves altering either the static, tangible, or visible aspects of its structure, shape, and spatial organization, or changing the underlying rules, algorithms, and interactive mechanisms that govern its behavior and functionality. These two categories are distinct and collectively cover the scope of actively reshaping such constructs.
11
From: "Modification of Dynamic Principles and Operative Logic"
Split Justification: Modification of dynamic principles and operative logic fundamentally bifurcates into two exhaustive and mutually exclusive approaches: one involves altering the quantitative values, thresholds, and conditions of existing parameters that govern system behavior (operational adjustment), while the other entails redefining or restructuring the core rules, causal relationships, and algorithmic sequences that constitute the system's underlying logic (systemic redefinition).
12
From: "Rule-Based Systemic Redefinition"
Split Justification: Rule-Based Systemic Redefinition fundamentally involves altering either the foundational definitions and intrinsic characteristics of a system's constituent entities and states, or restructuring the dynamic interplay, sequential operations, and cause-and-effect relationships that govern how those entities behave and transform within the system. These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a rule either primarily defines what something *is* or how it *acts/relates*, and together they exhaustively cover the scope of redefining a system's underlying logic.
✓
Topic: "Redefinition of Systemic Interactions and Causal Mechanisms" (W7803)