1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Kinship and Familial Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between family relationships primarily established through shared ancestry or bloodlines (kinship by descent) and those formed through marriage, adoption, or other social and legal compacts (kinship by alliance). This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of inherent and familial bonds.
6
From: "Kinship by Alliance"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances that establish a spousal or domestic partnership between adults (e.g., marriage, civil unions) and those that establish a parental or guardianship role for an adult towards a child (e.g., adoption, foster care). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a single alliance compact cannot simultaneously be both an adult partnership and a new parent-child bond, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of kinship established through formal compacts.
7
From: "Alliances Establishing Adult Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes adult partnership alliances based on the number of primary partners involved in the alliance: either exactly two individuals (monogamous) or more than two individuals (plural). This division is mutually exclusive, as an alliance cannot simultaneously be both, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all possible numerical configurations of adult partners in such alliances, a critical structural element for kinship systems.
8
From: "Monogamous Adult Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes monogamous adult partnerships based on whether their formal alliance is primarily established and recognized through legal systems (e.g., state marriage, civil union) or through established social customs, community norms, and explicit non-legal agreements. This division is mutually exclusive, as an alliance is either legally binding or it is not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of formal compacts for adult partnership between two individuals.
9
From: "Legally Constituted Monogamous Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between legally constituted monogamous partnerships specifically recognized as "marriage" under the law and all other forms of legally recognized, non-marital compacts between two adults (e.g., civil unions, registered partnerships, or domestic partnerships). This division is mutually exclusive, as a partnership is either designated as a marriage or it is not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all legal forms of monogamous adult alliances recognized by legal systems.
10
From: "Non-Marital Legal Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between non-marital legal partnerships designed to confer rights and obligations broadly equivalent to marriage (though not bearing the "marriage" designation) and those designed to provide a more restricted or specific set of legal rights, benefits, or responsibilities. This division is mutually exclusive, as an alliance cannot simultaneously be designed for both broad equivalence and limited scope, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of legally recognized, non-marital adult partnerships.
11
From: "Limited Scope Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between limited scope legal partnerships based on whether their primary legal intent and framework are established to manage and protect the partners' shared financial interests and material property, or to define and enable their mutual personal care, health, and welfare responsibilities. This division is mutually exclusive, as a partnership's foundational design will primarily center on one of these two distinct domains, even if there are secondary implications for the other. It is also comprehensively exhaustive, encompassing all fundamental categories of limited legal rights and obligations that adult partners might establish outside of a marriage-equivalent context.
12
From: "Partnerships for Shared Personal and Caregiving Responsibilities"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between legal partnerships primarily designed to formalize general mutual support, personal advocacy, and social recognition (e.g., visitation rights, emergency contact designation) and those primarily designed to grant authority for healthcare decisions, medical treatment consent, and end-of-life directives. These categories are mutually exclusive, as their primary legal intent and scope are distinct, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all fundamental aspects of limited legal agreements for personal care, health, and welfare responsibilities.
✓
Topic: "Partnerships for Healthcare and Medical Decision-Making" (W7952)