1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Pattern Matching & Implicit Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on direct sensory input (e.g., recognizing faces, sounds, immediate environmental threats) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on abstract meaning, categories, semantic knowledge, and higher-level schema (e.g., understanding language, social cues, expert intuition). These two categories delineate distinct levels of information abstraction in pattern processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how pre-existing patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
6
From: "Conceptual Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on abstract factual knowledge, semantic networks, and categories (knowing 'what' things are) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on skills, rules, and action sequences (knowing 'how' to do things). These two categories delineate distinct forms of conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
7
From: "Declarative Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on general knowledge, facts, and concepts independent of specific personal experience (e.g., knowing the capital of France) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on specific past events, personal experiences, and their associated contexts (e.g., recalling details of a specific birthday party). These two categories delineate distinct forms of declarative conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
8
From: "Semantic Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the inherent attributes, characteristics, and definitions that define individual concepts (e.g., recognizing 'a bird has feathers', 'a square has four equal sides') from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the connections, classifications, and associations between different concepts within a broader semantic network (e.g., recognizing 'birds are a type of animal', 'squares are a type of polygon', 'the relationship between supply and demand'). These two categories comprehensively cover how general knowledge patterns are implicitly identified and activated, focusing either on the defining 'what' of a concept or its 'how it connects' to others.
9
From: "Intrinsic Conceptual Attributes"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the descriptive qualities, characteristics, or states that inherently define an individual concept (e.g., 'a bird is an animal', 'water is a liquid', 'happiness is an emotion') from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the measurable properties, counts, or dimensions that inherently define an individual concept (e.g., 'a bird has two wings', 'water contains two hydrogen atoms', 'a triangle has three sides'). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how inherent attributes of a concept are implicitly identified and activated, distinguishing between its non-numeric descriptive features and its numeric or measurable features.
10
From: "Quantitative Intrinsic Attributes"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on countable, distinct units or whole numbers (e.g., 'number of sides', 'number of atoms') from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on measurable magnitudes that can take any value within a range (e.g., 'length', 'temperature', 'mass', 'volume'). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how inherent measurable attributes of a concept are implicitly identified and activated, distinguishing between quantities that are counted versus those that are measured.
11
From: "Continuous Quantitative Attributes"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates continuous quantitative attributes whose conceptual patterns are based on irreducible, foundational magnitudes (e.g., length, mass, time, temperature) from those whose conceptual patterns are based on combinations or relationships of other fundamental or derived magnitudes (e.g., speed, density, force, volume). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how inherent measurable magnitudes are implicitly identified and activated, distinguishing between their elemental conceptual basis and their composite conceptual basis.
12
From: "Derived Continuous Attributes"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates derived continuous attributes whose conceptual patterns are fully characterized by magnitude alone (e.g., speed, density, volume) from those that require both magnitude and an associated direction in space for complete conceptualization and pattern recognition (e.g., force, velocity, acceleration). This distinction captures a fundamental difference in how spatial information is implicitly integrated into and understood within these conceptual patterns, comprehensively covering the scope of derived continuous attributes.
✓
Topic: "Vector Derived Attributes" (W7955)