1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Intuitive/Associative Processing"
Split Justification: Intuitive/associative processing fundamentally operates in two distinct, yet complementary, modes: either by rapidly identifying and utilizing pre-existing patterns and associations (often automatically and implicitly), or by forming new, non-obvious connections that lead to emergent insights and novel ideas. These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how this cognitive function processes information.
5
From: "Pattern Matching & Implicit Activation"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on direct sensory input (e.g., recognizing faces, sounds, immediate environmental threats) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of patterns based on abstract meaning, categories, semantic knowledge, and higher-level schema (e.g., understanding language, social cues, expert intuition). These two categories delineate distinct levels of information abstraction in pattern processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how pre-existing patterns are implicitly identified and utilized.
6
From: "Conceptual Pattern Matching & Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on abstract factual knowledge, semantic networks, and categories (knowing 'what' things are) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on skills, rules, and action sequences (knowing 'how' to do things). These two categories delineate distinct forms of conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
7
From: "Declarative Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on general knowledge, facts, and concepts independent of specific personal experience (e.g., knowing the capital of France) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on specific past events, personal experiences, and their associated contexts (e.g., recalling details of a specific birthday party). These two categories delineate distinct forms of declarative conceptual knowledge processing, comprehensively covering the scope of how abstract patterns are implicitly identified and activated.
8
From: "Episodic Conceptual Pattern Activation"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the objective factual details, sequences, and descriptive elements of specific past events (e.g., recognizing that a current situation mirrors the actions or context of a past personal experience) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the subjective emotional states, sensations, and personal significance associated with those specific past events (e.g., recognizing that a current situation evokes the same feelings or reactions as a past personal experience). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of how patterns from personal past events are implicitly identified and activated.
9
From: "Activation of Event-Content Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the static entities, attributes, and relationships that comprised a specific past event (e.g., recognizing the specific people, objects, or locations from a past experience) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the dynamic actions, interactions, and temporal sequences that unfolded within that event (e.g., recognizing the particular steps or flow of an action sequence from a past experience). These two categories comprehensively cover the scope of objective factual details, sequences, and descriptive elements of specific past events.
10
From: "Activation of Event-Process Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the discrete, constituent actions or operations that occurred within a past event (e.g., recognizing specific movements, utterances, or singular changes of state) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of conceptual patterns based on the temporal ordering, causal relationships, and overall progression that link these individual actions into a coherent dynamic sequence or flow (e.g., recognizing the step-by-step unfolding or the interactive dynamics of the event). These two categories comprehensively cover the dynamic actions, interactions, and temporal sequences that unfolded within an event.
11
From: "Activation of Event-Action Trajectory Patterns"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of action trajectory patterns based on their inherent orientation towards achieving a specific outcome, objective, or consequence (e.g., recognizing a plan of action, a recipe, or a task completion sequence) from the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of action trajectory patterns based on the observable, chronological unfolding, characteristic flow, or sequence of an event, independent of a singular, overarching, purpose-driven endpoint that defines the pattern (e.g., recognizing the rhythm of a natural phenomenon, the dynamics of a social interaction, or the progression of an ongoing activity). These two categories comprehensively cover the distinct ways coherent dynamic sequences or flows of actions are implicitly identified and activated within episodic memory.
12
From: "Activation of Process-Descriptive Action Trajectories"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the rapid, often automatic, identification and utilization of action trajectory patterns based on their inherent periodicity, recurrence, or regular repetition over time from those based on their non-repeating, sequential, and often directional unfolding towards a novel state or configuration. These two categories comprehensively cover the distinct ways coherent dynamic sequences or flows of actions are implicitly identified and activated when describing a process, independent of a specific goal.
✓
Topic: "Activation of Progressive Process-Descriptive Action Trajectories" (W8019)