1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Kinship and Familial Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between family relationships primarily established through shared ancestry or bloodlines (kinship by descent) and those formed through marriage, adoption, or other social and legal compacts (kinship by alliance). This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of inherent and familial bonds.
6
From: "Kinship by Descent"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between kin relationships established in a direct line of ascent or descent (e.g., parent-child, grandparent-grandchild) and those who share a common ancestor but are not in a direct lineal relationship (e.g., siblings, cousins, aunts/uncles). This classification provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of kinship by descent.
7
From: "Direct Kinship"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between direct lineal relationships tracing upwards to ancestors (e.g., parents, grandparents) and those tracing downwards to descendants (e.g., children, grandchildren). This classification provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of direct kinship.
8
From: "Direct Ancestral Kinship"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between direct ancestral relationships that are one generation removed from the individual (parents) and those that are two or more generations removed (grandparents, great-grandparents, and so on). This division is mutually exclusive, as a relationship cannot be both parental and non-parental in the direct line, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of direct ancestral kinship.
9
From: "Grandparental and Remoter Ancestral Kinship"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between direct ancestral kin who are two generations removed from the individual (grandparents) and those who are three or more generations removed (great-grandparents and all subsequent ancestors). This division is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of grandparental and remoter ancestral kinship.
10
From: "Great-Grandparental and Further Ancestral Kinship"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between direct ancestral kin who are exactly three generations removed from the individual (great-grandparents) and those who are four or more generations removed (great-great-grandparents and all subsequent ancestors). This division is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of great-grandparental and further ancestral kinship.
11
From: "Further Ancestral Kinship"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between direct ancestral kin who are exactly four generations removed from the individual (great-great-grandparents) and those who are five or more generations removed (great-great-great-grandparents and all subsequent ancestors). This division is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of further ancestral kinship.
12
From: "Remoter Ancestral Kinship (Five or More Generations Removed)"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between direct ancestral kin who are exactly five generations removed from the individual (great-great-great-grandparents) and those who are six or more generations removed (great-great-great-great-grandparents and all subsequent ancestors). This division is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of remoter ancestral kinship (five or more generations removed).
✓
Topic: "Ancestral Kinship (Six or More Generations Removed)" (W8064)