1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: All human interaction with the non-human world fundamentally involves either the cognitive process of seeking knowledge, meaning, or appreciation from it (e.g., science, observation, art), or the active, practical process of physically altering, shaping, or making use of it for various purposes (e.g., technology, engineering, resource management). These two modes represent distinct primary intentions and outcomes, yet together comprehensively cover the full scope of how humans engage with the non-human realm.
4
From: "Modifying and Utilizing the Non-Human World"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates human activities within the "Modifying and Utilizing the Non-Human World" into two exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. The first focuses on directly altering, extracting from, cultivating, and managing the planet's inherent geological, biological, and energetic systems (e.g., agriculture, mining, direct energy harnessing, water management). The second focuses on the design, construction, manufacturing, and operation of complex artificial systems, technologies, and built environments that human intelligence creates from these processed natural elements (e.g., civil engineering, manufacturing, software development, robotics, power grids). Together, these two categories cover the full spectrum of how humans actively reshape and leverage the non-human realm.
5
From: "Creating and Advancing Human-Engineered Superstructures"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates human-engineered superstructures based on their primary mode of existence and interaction. The first category encompasses all tangible, material structures, machines, and physical networks built by humans. The second covers all intangible, computational, and data-based architectures, algorithms, and virtual environments that operate within the digital realm. Together, these two categories comprehensively cover the full spectrum of artificial systems and environments humans create, and they are mutually exclusive in their primary manifestation.
6
From: "Engineered Physical Constructs and Infrastructures"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between the large-scale, often fixed, and interconnected physical systems that form the fundamental backbone and enabling environment for human activity and society (e.g., transportation networks, utility grids, major public facilities), versus the more discrete, often mobile, and purpose-specific physical constructs and objects designed for direct operational use, individual function, or localized habitation within or upon these foundational systems (e.g., vehicles, tools, machinery, appliances, individual dwellings).
7
From: "Operational Constructs and Discrete Objects"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates physical constructs based on their primary mode of function. The first category encompasses objects designed for active task performance, transformation, mobility, or direct operational use (e.g., tools, machinery, vehicles, active appliances). The second category includes objects designed primarily to provide a static environment, shelter, storage, or passive containment for living or holding other objects (e.g., individual dwellings, furniture, containers, sheds). These two categories are mutually exclusive in their primary intent and comprehensively cover the scope of operational constructs and discrete objects.
8
From: "Dynamic Operational Devices and Vehicles"
Split Justification: ** This dichotomy fundamentally separates dynamic operational constructs based on their primary mode of function. The first category encompasses physical constructs designed primarily for self-propulsion and the movement of people, goods, or information across distances. The second category includes physical constructs designed primarily to perform active tasks involving transformation, manipulation, or processing of materials, information, or energy, often within a more localized or task-specific operational context, even if they possess internal or limited external movement for task execution. These two categories are mutually exclusive in their primary intent and comprehensively cover the scope of dynamic operational devices and vehicles.
9
From: "Tools, Machinery, and Processing Devices"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally separates physical tools, machinery, and processing devices based on their primary operational domain. The first category encompasses constructs whose main function is to directly alter, shape, move, or combine tangible physical materials. The second category includes constructs whose primary purpose is to generate, convert, store, transmit, control, measure, or analyze energy or information (signals, data). These two categories are mutually exclusive in their core functional intent and comprehensively cover the scope of physical dynamic operational devices.
10
From: "Devices for Energy and Information Processing"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates devices based on their primary operational function. The first category encompasses physical constructs designed primarily for the direct creation, conversion between forms, transfer, or containment of energy. The second category includes physical constructs whose main purpose is the acquisition, computation, logical manipulation, transmission, or display of information (signals, data), often to monitor or regulate other systems, including energy flows. These two categories are mutually exclusive in their core functional intent and comprehensively cover the scope of physical dynamic operational devices.
11
From: "Information Sensing, Processing, and Control Devices"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates physical information devices based on their primary role in the information flow. The first category encompasses devices primarily designed to acquire information from the environment (sensing), present information to users (display), or transmit information between locations or systems (communication). The second category includes devices primarily designed to perform logical operations, calculations, and transformations on information (computation) and to execute predefined actions or regulate systems based on this processed information (automation/control). Together, these two categories are mutually exclusive in their core functional intent and comprehensively cover the scope of information sensing, processing, and control devices.
12
From: "Information Computation and Automation Devices"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates physical information devices based on their primary operational outcome. The first category encompasses devices fundamentally designed to perform abstract calculations, logical operations, and complex data transformations, with their primary output being processed information itself. The second category includes devices whose main function is to utilize processed information to directly manage, regulate, and execute commands upon other systems, machinery, or physical processes, often involving feedback mechanisms and real-world interactions to achieve automated behavior. Together, these two categories are mutually exclusive in their core functional intent and comprehensively cover the scope of information computation and automation devices.
✓
Topic: "System Automation and Control Actuators" (W8110)