1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Quantitative/Logical Reasoning"
Split Justification: Logical reasoning can be strictly formal following rules of inference (**Deductive Proof**) or drawing general conclusions from specific examples (**Inductive Reasoning Case Study**). (L5 Split)
6
From: "Inductive Reasoning Case Study"
Split Justification: Induction involves forming general rules (**Hypothesis Generation**) and testing their predictive power (**Hypothesis Testing**). (L6 Split)
7
From: "Hypothesis Generation"
Split Justification: Generating a hypothesis requires identifying a pattern (**Observing Correlations**) and formulating a testable explanation (**Stating a Falsifiable Claim**).
8
From: "Stating a Falsifiable Claim"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between claims that assert a specific outcome based on given conditions and claims that assert a universal property or relationship for an entire category, both being fundamental forms of falsifiable statements.
9
From: "Stating a Categorical Generalization"
Split Justification: This dichotomy differentiates categorical generalizations based on the scope of their quantifier: whether the claim applies to all members of a category (universal) or to at least one member (particular). This is a fundamental logical distinction that is mutually exclusive and comprehensively covers all forms of categorical generalizations.
10
From: "Particular Categorical Generalization"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates particular categorical generalizations based on whether their specificity arises from delineating the population or domain to which the generalization applies (defined scope), or from specifying the situational, environmental, or operational criteria under which the generalization holds true (stated conditions). These represent distinct modes of particularizing a general claim.
11
From: "Generalization with Stated Conditions"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates conditions based on whether they originate from the inherent properties, states, or actions of the subject(s) of the generalization (Subject-Dependent) or from external environmental factors, situational circumstances, or broader contextual influences (Context-Dependent). This provides a fundamental, mutually exclusive, and jointly exhaustive classification of the nature of the stated conditions.
12
From: "Generalization with Context-Dependent Conditions"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between context-dependent conditions whose truth or relevance can be directly perceived or empirically measured within a given context, and those that require interpretation, inference, or a deeper understanding of non-obvious contextual elements to be established. Both categories represent how a generalization's validity hinges on specific, context-dependent conditions.
✓
Topic: "Conditions Based on Inferred Contextual Attributes" (W8143)