Quantification of Relative Evidential Support
Level 11
~46 years, 5 mo old
Oct 29 - Nov 4, 1979
🚧 Content Planning
Initial research phase. Tools and protocols are being defined.
Rationale & Protocol
For a 46-year-old adult engaging with 'Quantification of Relative Evidential Support,' the emphasis shifts from foundational cognitive development to advanced skill acquisition, critical thinking, and practical application within their professional or intellectual pursuits. Our selection is guided by three core developmental principles for this age and topic:
- Practical Application & Skill Enhancement: Tools must facilitate direct, hands-on application of complex statistical concepts to real-world problems. The goal is to equip the individual with actionable methods for evaluating evidence in data-driven decision-making.
- Accessibility & Self-Directed Learning: Recognizing the busy schedules and existing knowledge base of adult learners, resources should be structured for self-paced study, offering clear explanations without unnecessary mathematical obfuscation, while still maintaining rigor.
- Conceptual Depth & Critical Thinking: The tools should not just teach 'how' to quantify evidence, but 'why' certain approaches (like Bayesian methods) are valuable, fostering a deeper understanding of statistical inference, its philosophical underpinnings, and the limitations of different methodologies.
The primary recommendation, 'Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan' by Richard McElreath (2nd Edition), is chosen as the best-in-class tool globally because it exquisitely balances these principles. It is renowned for making complex Bayesian inference — including model comparison and the explicit evaluation of relative evidential support (e.g., through information criteria and posterior probability comparisons) — intuitive and accessible without sacrificing rigor. The integration of R and Stan provides the immediate practical application crucial for adult skill enhancement.
Implementation Protocol for a 46-year-old:
- Resource Acquisition: Obtain the latest edition of the 'Statistical Rethinking' textbook. Ensure a personal computer is set up with R and RStudio (free, recommended extras), and the necessary Stan interfaces (
rstanorcmdstanr). Access to Richard McElreath's accompanying YouTube lecture series is highly encouraged for supplementary learning. - Structured Self-Study (12-16 weeks): Dedicate approximately 5-10 hours per week. Begin with a foundational understanding of probability and likelihood (Chapters 1-3). Progress to building and evaluating simple and complex models (Chapters 4-8), with a strong focus on interpreting model fit and comparing alternative hypotheses – the direct application of 'quantification of relative evidential support.' Actively work through all practice problems, implementing the R/Stan code provided.
- Deep Dive into Evidential Support: Pay particular attention to chapters discussing model comparison using information criteria (e.g., WAIC, PSIS) and understanding how posterior probabilities of hypotheses are updated. While Bayes Factors are not the sole focus, the conceptual framework for evaluating relative evidence is deeply ingrained throughout.
- Practical Project Application: Identify a small, relevant dataset from personal interest or professional work. Apply the learned Bayesian modeling and evidence quantification techniques to answer specific questions, comparing different hypothesized models. This hands-on project solidifies understanding and translates theoretical knowledge into practical skill.
- Community Engagement: Engage with online communities (e.g., Stan discourse forum, Cross Validated Stack Exchange, academic subreddits) to discuss challenges, clarify concepts, and learn from diverse applications. This iterative process of learning, applying, and discussing provides maximum developmental leverage.
Primary Tool Tier 1 Selection
Cover of Statistical Rethinking (2nd Edition)
This textbook is globally recognized as the leading resource for learning Bayesian statistics in an intuitive, accessible, yet rigorous manner. For a 46-year-old, it offers the perfect blend of theoretical depth and practical application via R and Stan. It directly addresses model comparison and the interpretation of evidential support, making the complex topic of 'Quantification of Relative Evidential Support' tangible and actionable. Its narrative style and focus on conceptual understanding over pure mathematical derivation make it ideal for self-directed adult learners seeking to integrate advanced statistical reasoning into their professional or intellectual toolkit.
Also Includes:
DIY / No-Tool Project (Tier 0)
A "No-Tool" project for this week is currently being designed.
Alternative Candidates (Tiers 2-4)
Bayesian Data Analysis (3rd Edition) by Gelman et al.
A comprehensive and authoritative graduate-level textbook on Bayesian statistics. It covers a vast array of topics with mathematical rigor and theoretical depth, including hierarchical models, computation, and model checking.
Analysis:
While undeniably a foundational and indispensable reference in Bayesian statistics, 'Bayesian Data Analysis' is significantly more mathematically dense and less 'beginner-friendly' for self-directed learning for a 46-year-old adult who might be approaching the topic without a strong, recent mathematical background. Its focus is broader than specifically 'quantification of relative evidential support' and its steepest learning curve makes it a better reference text than a primary learning tool for initial acquisition, especially compared to the more pedagogical approach of 'Statistical Rethinking'.
Coursera Specialization: Bayesian Statistics from Duke University
An online specialization covering foundational Bayesian concepts, modeling, and computation using R. It's structured into multiple courses and includes practical assignments.
Analysis:
Online specializations like this offer structured learning and peer interaction, which are excellent for adult learners. However, they can sometimes lack the deep, unified philosophical narrative present in 'Statistical Rethinking' and may not focus as intensely on the *conceptual quantification of relative evidential support* as a core theme throughout, often emphasizing parameter estimation and credible intervals more broadly. The specific content on Bayes Factors or similar evidence metrics might be less central compared to McElreath's approach which inherently builds towards comparing models.
What's Next? (Child Topics)
"Quantification of Relative Evidential Support" evolves into:
Direction of Relative Evidential Advantage
Explore Topic →Week 6511Strength of Relative Evidential Advantage
Explore Topic →Quantification of relative evidential support inherently provides two distinct types of information about the comparison between hypotheses: the direction, indicating which hypothesis is favored (e.g., H1 over H0), and the strength, representing the magnitude of that favoritism. These two aspects are mutually exclusive yet together comprehensively define the concept of relative evidential support.