1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "Internal World (The Self)"
Split Justification: The Internal World involves both mental processes (**Cognitive Sphere**) and physical experiences (**Somatic Sphere**). (Ref: Mind-Body Distinction)
3
From: "Cognitive Sphere"
Split Justification: Cognition operates via deliberate, logical steps (**Analytical Processing**) and faster, intuitive pattern-matching (**Intuitive/Associative Processing**). (Ref: Dual Process Theory)
4
From: "Analytical Processing"
Split Justification: Analytical thought engages distinct symbolic systems: abstract logic and mathematics (**Quantitative/Logical Reasoning**) versus structured language (**Linguistic/Verbal Reasoning**).
5
From: "Quantitative/Logical Reasoning"
Split Justification: Logical reasoning can be strictly formal following rules of inference (**Deductive Proof**) or drawing general conclusions from specific examples (**Inductive Reasoning Case Study**). (L5 Split)
6
From: "Inductive Reasoning Case Study"
Split Justification: Induction involves forming general rules (**Hypothesis Generation**) and testing their predictive power (**Hypothesis Testing**). (L6 Split)
7
From: "Hypothesis Generation"
Split Justification: Generating a hypothesis requires identifying a pattern (**Observing Correlations**) and formulating a testable explanation (**Stating a Falsifiable Claim**).
8
From: "Observing Correlations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the process of identifying relationships based on numerical data and statistical analysis from the process of discerning patterns and connections within non-numerical, descriptive, or categorical information. Together, these two categories comprehensively cover the fundamental modes of observing correlations in any form of data or experience for hypothesis generation.
9
From: "Observing Qualitative Associations"
Split Justification: This dichotomy distinguishes between identifying qualitative associations based on the intrinsic, common attributes or characteristics of the observed elements (e.g., shared themes, categories, or properties), versus identifying associations based on their extrinsic relationships in time, space, or condition (e.g., events happening together, one after another, or one appearing contingent on another).
10
From: "Observing Associations by Shared Qualities"
Split Justification: This dichotomy differentiates between observing shared qualities that are concrete, directly perceivable, or physical (tangible attributes like color, shape, texture) versus those that are abstract, functional, symbolic, or relational, requiring conceptual understanding (like purpose, role, or underlying principle). This comprehensively covers the types of qualitative attributes used for association.
11
From: "Observing Associations by Conceptual Qualities"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the observation of associations based on the inherent, defining characteristics and meanings of concepts themselves (intrinsic qualities) from those based on how concepts interact, function, or relate to one another within a broader context (relational qualities).
12
From: "Observing Associations by Relational Conceptual Qualities"
Split Justification: This dichotomy separates the observation of relationships based on the inherent organization, composition, or classification of concepts (structural) from those based on how concepts interact, operate, or fulfill purposes within a system or context (functional). These two categories comprehensively cover the ways in which concepts can be relationally associated while remaining distinct in their focus.
✓
Topic: "Observing Associations by Functional Conceptual Relations" (W7823)