1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Personal Relationships"
Split Justification: Personal relationships can be fundamentally divided based on whether their primary origin is an unchosen, inherent bond (such as family or blood ties) or a volitional, chosen connection based on mutual interests, affection, or shared values. This dichotomy accounts for all personal bonds.
5
From: "Kinship and Familial Relationships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between family relationships primarily established through shared ancestry or bloodlines (kinship by descent) and those formed through marriage, adoption, or other social and legal compacts (kinship by alliance). This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for all forms of inherent and familial bonds.
6
From: "Kinship by Alliance"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between alliances that establish a spousal or domestic partnership between adults (e.g., marriage, civil unions) and those that establish a parental or guardianship role for an adult towards a child (e.g., adoption, foster care). These two categories are mutually exclusive, as a single alliance compact cannot simultaneously be both an adult partnership and a new parent-child bond, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of kinship established through formal compacts.
7
From: "Alliances Establishing Adult Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes adult partnership alliances based on the number of primary partners involved in the alliance: either exactly two individuals (monogamous) or more than two individuals (plural). This division is mutually exclusive, as an alliance cannot simultaneously be both, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all possible numerical configurations of adult partners in such alliances, a critical structural element for kinship systems.
8
From: "Monogamous Adult Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes monogamous adult partnerships based on whether their formal alliance is primarily established and recognized through legal systems (e.g., state marriage, civil union) or through established social customs, community norms, and explicit non-legal agreements. This division is mutually exclusive, as an alliance is either legally binding or it is not, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all forms of formal compacts for adult partnership between two individuals.
9
From: "Socially Constituted Monogamous Partnerships"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between monogamous adult partnerships whose social recognition primarily arises from the sustained observable practices and cohabitation of the partners, aligning with community customs and norms (e.g., de facto common-law relationships), and those whose social recognition is formally established through a specific, explicit non-legal agreement, declaration, or ritual, affirmed by their community. This provides a mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive division for how socially constituted partnerships gain their recognized status without legal enactment.
10
From: "Socially Recognized Through Established Practice"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between socially recognized partnerships where the primary basis for recognition through established practice is the observable integration of the partners' domestic lives and shared resources (e.g., cohabitation, shared household responsibilities), and those where the primary basis is their consistent public presentation and identification as a unified couple within the broader community (e.g., how they are introduced, joint social engagements). These two aspects represent mutually exclusive primary drivers for implicit social recognition and comprehensively cover all forms of established practice.
11
From: "Recognition Through Public Partnership Identification"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between public partnership identification that occurs through explicit verbal declarations or formal presentations of the partnership (e.g., being introduced as partners) and identification that arises implicitly from the community's consistent observation and inference based on the partners' joint presence, behaviors, and interactions in public settings. These two forms are mutually exclusive as primary mechanisms of recognition and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all ways a partnership can be publicly identified without formal domestic integration.
12
From: "Implicit Social Acknowledgment via Observed Interaction"
Split Justification: This dichotomy fundamentally distinguishes between implicit social acknowledgment of a partnership primarily based on observing partners' public expressions of emotional connection, intimacy, and affection (affective display), and acknowledgment based on observing their coordinated actions, mutual support, and integrated functioning as a unit in public settings (collaborative engagement). These represent mutually exclusive primary categories of observed interactions leading to implicit recognition and comprehensively cover all ways a partnership is implicitly identified through observed behavior.
✓
Topic: "Recognition Through Observable Collaborative Engagement" (W7824)