1
From: "Human Potential & Development."
Split Justification: Development fundamentally involves both our inner landscape (**Internal World**) and our interaction with everything outside us (**External World**). (Ref: Subject-Object Distinction)..
2
From: "External World (Interaction)"
Split Justification: All external interactions fundamentally involve either other human beings (social, cultural, relational, political) or the non-human aspects of existence (physical environment, objects, technology, natural world). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.
3
From: "Interaction with Humans"
Split Justification: All human interaction can be fundamentally categorized by its primary focus: either on the direct connection and relationship between specific individuals (from intimate bonds to fleeting encounters), or on the individual's engagement within and navigation of larger organized human collectives, their rules, roles, and systems. This dichotomy provides a comprehensive and distinct division between person-to-person dynamics and person-to-society dynamics.
4
From: "Social Systems and Structures"
Split Justification: All social systems and structures can be fundamentally categorized by whether their rules, roles, and organization are explicitly codified, institutionalized, and formally enforced (formal systems), or are unwritten, emergent, culturally embedded, and maintained through custom, tradition, and implicit social pressure (informal systems). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as a system's primary mode of operation is either formal or informal, and comprehensively exhaustive, covering all aspects of collective human organization.
5
From: "Informal Social Systems"
Split Justification: All informal social systems can be fundamentally divided into two mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive categories: those focused on the collective, unwritten understandings, values, beliefs, traditions, and customs that guide behavior (Shared Meaning and Norms), and those focused on the spontaneous, interactional processes and structures of influence, status, reputation, and cohesion that arise within groups (Emergent Social Dynamics). One describes the content and collective interpretation of the informal system, while the other describes the interactive mechanisms and relational outcomes.
6
From: "Emergent Social Dynamics"
Split Justification: ** All emergent social dynamics can be fundamentally divided into the active, ongoing processes of interaction that generate them (such as influence attempts, social signaling, and reciprocal exchanges) and the more stable, patterned configurations that arise as a result of these interactions (such as informal hierarchies, established reputations, and levels of group cohesion). This dichotomy separates the real-time unfolding mechanisms of social activity from the patterned outcomes that define informal social organization, ensuring mutual exclusivity and comprehensive exhaustion.
7
From: "Emergent Social Configurations"
Split Justification: All emergent social configurations can be fundamentally divided into those patterned outcomes that define the distribution of informal power, prestige, and perceived importance among individuals (e.g., informal hierarchies, individual reputations), and those patterned outcomes that define the distribution of emotional bonds, affinities, and sense of integration or estrangement within the collective (e.g., group cohesion, emergent cliques). This dichotomy separates the organizational patterns of social sway and respect from the relational patterns of emotional ties and belonging, ensuring mutual exclusivity as these are distinct dimensions of informal social patterning, and comprehensive exhaustion by covering the primary forms of stable emergent social organization.
8
From: "Configurations of Social Influence and Status"
Split Justification: All configurations of social influence and status can be fundamentally divided into the patterned, relational orderings of individuals based on their relative power and importance within a collective (informal status hierarchies), and the collectively recognized, enduring attributes and character of specific individuals that define their unique informal standing and perceived worth (individual reputational standing). This dichotomy separates the emergent structural arrangements of influence and prestige from the personal, attributed dimensions of status, ensuring mutual exclusivity and comprehensive exhaustion by covering both the relational organization and the individual recognition aspects of informal social power.
9
From: "Informal Status Hierarchies"
Split Justification: All informal status hierarchies, which represent patterned, relational orderings of individuals based on their relative power and importance, can be fundamentally divided based on the primary mechanism driving status attainment and maintenance. This involves either hierarchies established and maintained primarily through the assertion of power, intimidation, and the ability to impose one's will (Dominance-Based Informal Hierarchies), or hierarchies where status is granted through voluntary deference and respect for perceived competence, valuable contributions, or admired qualities (Prestige-Based Informal Hierarchies). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as the foundational operational principle of a hierarchy leans primarily on one mechanism or the other, and comprehensively exhaustive by encompassing the two universally recognized pathways to informal social status.
10
From: "Prestige-Based Informal Hierarchies"
Split Justification: All prestige-based informal hierarchies, where status is granted through voluntary deference and respect, can be fundamentally divided based on the primary source of that respect. This involves either hierarchies where status is primarily based on individuals' perceived instrumental value, stemming from their skills, knowledge, expertise, and proven ability to make valuable contributions (Competence-Based Prestige Hierarchies), or hierarchies where status is primarily based on individuals' perceived expressive or moral value, stemming from their character, integrity, wisdom, fairness, or other admirable personal qualities (Virtue-Based Prestige Hierarchies). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, as the foundational reason for deference is distinct in each case, and comprehensively exhaustive by encompassing all sources of prestige outlined in the parent node's definition ("perceived competence, valuable contributions, or admired qualities").
11
From: "Virtue-Based Prestige Hierarchies"
Split Justification: All virtue-based prestige hierarchies can be fundamentally divided based on whether status is primarily conferred due to individuals' perceived embodiment of virtues that govern their interactions with others and contribute to collective well-being (e.g., fairness, compassion, trustworthiness), or due to their perceived embodiment of virtues that reflect their inner strength, moral fiber, and depth of understanding as individuals (e.g., wisdom, courage, authenticity). This dichotomy distinguishes between virtues valued for their social and relational impact and those valued for their individual excellence and internal qualities, ensuring mutual exclusivity and comprehensive exhaustion of the parent concept's scope.
12
From: "Virtues of Prosocial Conduct and Ethical Relations"
Split Justification: All virtues of prosocial conduct and ethical relations can be fundamentally divided into those focused on upholding universal principles of interaction, ensuring relational integrity through truthfulness, trustworthiness, and impartiality (e.g., honesty, promise-keeping, due process), and those focused on an active, empathetic engagement with others to promote their well-being and contribute to the collective good (e.g., compassion, generosity, helpfulness). This dichotomy is mutually exclusive, separating virtues that define the ethical 'rules of engagement' from those that drive positive, active contributions, and comprehensively exhaustive by encompassing all aspects of ethical relations and prosocial behavior.
✓
Topic: "Virtues of Empathetic Engagement and Collective Well-being" (W6972)